Cyberleaf vs Innofactor MDRaaS
Cyberleaf is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Cyberleaf targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Innofactor MDRaaS serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cyberleaf includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Innofactor MDRaaS (Cloud).
Buyer brief
Cyberleaf is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Cyberleaf targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Innofactor MDRaaS serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cyberleaf includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Innofactor MDRaaS (Cloud).
Cyberleaf (Services firm) and Innofactor MDRaaS (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyberleaf's cyberleaf fits buyers that want a u.s.-based soc to operate across endpoint, cloud, identity, net... or Innofactor MDRaaS's innofactor mdraas fits microsoft-heavy nordic buyers that want sentinel-based monitoring while ke....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Growing businesses with 50-500 employees that have IT staff but no internal SOC | Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Growing businesses with 50-500 employees that have IT staff but no internal SOC
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberleafTECH-AGNOSTIC | Innofactor MDRaaSTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | IsolateCustom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom quote. No public per-endpoint, per-user or package price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom monthly pricing based on environment size and service needs. MSP partner pricing is described as predictable per-client pricing. | Tiered custom quote. Innofactor publishes Basic, Standard and Advanced MDRaaS tiers, each marked ask for pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | The website says managed cybersecurity includes proactive services, while the public service agreement excludes some advanced work unless separately contracted.. No public MDR-specific SLA table was found.. The public agreement references annual, 24-month and 36-month terms, with renewal terms and add-on ordering handled through the sales order.. Remote access, collectors, virtual machines or servers may be required to deliver service, and some access methods can add charges. | Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.. Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Public pages do not publish named response actions or response SLAs.. Customers keep ownership of logs and incidents, so internal responsibility for mitigation should be clear before signing. |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Annual, 24 months, 36 months, Custom | Tier1 Basic, Tier2 Standard, Tier3 Advanced, Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPhonePortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Most deployments are described as fully operational within weeks. Exact timeline depends on the customer environment and sales order. | Innofactor says the core infrastructure resides in the customer's Azure cloud environment and needs no on-premises infrastructure. It describes deployment as rapid and light, but does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | Defense Industrial BaseHealthcareFinancial ServicesTechnologySaaSPrivate EquityGovernment Contractors | Public SectorFinancial ServicesTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Cyberleaf has a clear current vendor story, public customer language and partner positioning, but little independent MDR review volume was found in this pass. The strongest evidence is vendor-controlled, so buyer validation should lean on references, a proof of value and careful review of the sales order. | Innofactor has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Nordic Microsoft expertise, Sentinel in the customer's Azure environment, tiered service levels and clear customer control of logs and incidents. Buyers should validate response authority, total licensing cost, add-on scope and Tier3 operating model before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2CMMCNIST 800-171HIPAAPCI DSSISO 27001ITAR | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 13485AQAP-2110ISO 14001 |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IICyberAB Registered Practitioner Organization | ISO 9001:2015ISO 13485:2016ISO/IEC 27001:2022AQAP-2110ISO 14001:2015Microsoft Solution Partner designationsMicrosoft Advanced Specializations |
| Founded | 2010 | 2000 |
| Data retention | Not published. Cyberleaf says it indemnifies customers from license and data ingestion costs, but retention period and export terms were not found. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Innofactor says logs and incidents remain in the customer's own Azure environment. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyberleaf and Innofactor MDRaaS?
Cyberleaf is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyberleaf covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Innofactor MDRaaS.
How do Cyberleaf and Innofactor MDRaaS differ in response capabilities?
Cyberleaf supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Innofactor MDRaaS supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting.
How does Cyberleaf pricing compare to Innofactor MDRaaS?
Cyberleaf pricing: Custom quote. No public per-endpoint, per-user or package price found.. Innofactor MDRaaS pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyberleaf: The website says managed cybersecurity includes proactive services, while the public service agreement excludes some advanced work unless separately contracted.; No public MDR-specific SLA table was found.. Watch for with Innofactor MDRaaS: Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.; Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect..
Should I choose Cyberleaf or Innofactor MDRaaS?
Choose Cyberleaf if: growing businesses with 50-500 employees that have IT staff but no internal SOC. Choose Innofactor MDRaaS if: nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel. Cyberleaf is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales. Innofactor MDRaaS is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.