CyberCX vs Wirespeed
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. CyberCX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. CyberCX includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. CyberCX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. CyberCX includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
CyberCX (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Wirespeed (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CyberCX's regional anz leader with 9 crest-accredited socs, ~1,400 security professionals, and microsoft ad... or Wirespeed's wirespeed is most interesting as an automated mdr layer for msps, lean security teams and coaliti....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberCXTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CrowdStrike FalconSentinelOnePalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Azure SentinelSplunk | Microsoft SentinelGeneric Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, Microsoft security modules monitored, and coverage scope. No public pricing available. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee. Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. No public pricing. Requires direct sales engagement to get any cost estimate. Accenture acquisition (closed Feb 2026) may change service models, pricing structures, or contract terms during integration | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-PacificEurope | North America |
| Onboarding | Weeks to months. Requires expert build, tuning, and configuration of the Microsoft security stack before monitoring begins. | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareEducationTechnology | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | CREST Level 2 accredited with strong ANZ presence, but almost no independent reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Known regionally for Microsoft expertise and DFIR capability (250+ breaches/year). The Accenture acquisition creates uncertainty around service continuity. Minimal discussion on Reddit or practitioner forums compared to global MDR providers. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | CREST SOC Level 2ISO 27001GDPR supportDORA support | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | CREST SOC Level 2Microsoft Advanced Specialization - Threat ProtectionMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Identity and Access ManagementMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Cloud Security | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2019 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published. Governed by customer's own Microsoft Sentinel retention settings. | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between CyberCX and Wirespeed?
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberCX covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do CyberCX and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
CyberCX supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with CyberCX and not included with Wirespeed.
How does CyberCX pricing compare to Wirespeed?
CyberCX pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with CyberCX: Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee; Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose CyberCX or Wirespeed?
Choose CyberCX if: aNZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. CyberCX is not ideal for organizations outside ANZ or UK that need global SOC coverage across North America, LATAM, or broader APAC. Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.