Cipher vs Sygnia
Cipher and Sygnia are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Sygnia serves Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 5 for Sygnia (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Cipher and Sygnia are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Sygnia serves Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 5 for Sygnia (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Sygnia offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 0). Cipher may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools | Enterprises wanting MDR and IR from the same team with no handoff or separate retainer |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Enterprises wanting MDR and IR from the same team with no handoff or separate retainer
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CipherTECH-AGNOSTIC | SygniaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft DefenderCarbon BlackSophosSymantec Endpoint ProtectionBitdefenderCisco Secure EndpointFortinet FortiEDRPalo Alto Cortex |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | SplunkMicrosoft SentinelSumo Logic |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Cipher does not publish xMDR package pricing. | Enterprise custom pricing only. No published tiers or self-service quotes. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The site names EDR and IPS/IDS integration but does not publish named vendor integrations.. Response wording is broad, so buyers should document pre-approved actions before go-live. | No published pricing, requires significant sales engagement for a ballpark quote. 8 dedicated experts per client implies premium pricing, likely $200K+/year. Custom detection rules (up to 200) built in Velocity are not portable if you leave |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, xMDR Services, xMDR Platform | Custom |
| Channels | Portal | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeLATAM | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Cipher advertises 20 days for full service activation, but buyers should confirm scope and contract timing. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Industry focus | HealthcareProfessional ServicesPayments | Financial ServicesHealthcareEnergyIndustrial/ManufacturingTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Cipher's Prosegur ownership, xMDR Platform, 24/7 SOC claim, six-SOC footprint, portal access and existing-stack positioning. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and SOC delivery details directly. | Thin public review presence. No G2 or Reddit reviews. Gartner Peer Insights has a listing with limited reviews. PeerSpot has a profile but minimal MDR-specific feedback. Gartner DFIR Market Guide Representative Vendor four consecutive years (2022-2025). Two CEO changes in six months (2025). |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC 1SOC 2PCI DSSCREST | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC ISOC IIPCI QSAPCI ASVCRESTTF-CSIRTCIPHER-CSIRT RFC2350 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | – | 2015 |
| Data retention | Cipher says all platform information is online 24/7 and available from any device. No public standard MDR data-retention period was found. | Sygnia-managed Snowflake data lake. No stated retention limit. Export process on exit not documented. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cipher and Sygnia?
Cipher is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sygnia is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cipher covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Sygnia.
How do Cipher and Sygnia differ in response capabilities?
Cipher supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Sygnia supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Cipher and included with Sygnia.
How does Cipher pricing compare to Sygnia?
Cipher pricing: Not published. Sygnia pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Cipher: Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Watch for with Sygnia: No published pricing, requires significant sales engagement for a ballpark quote; 8 dedicated experts per client implies premium pricing, likely $200K+/year.
Should I choose Cipher or Sygnia?
Choose Cipher if: mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools. Choose Sygnia if: enterprises wanting MDR and IR from the same team with no handoff or separate retainer. Cipher is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Sygnia is not ideal for sMBs or mid-market organizations (enterprise-only pricing, likely $200K+/year).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.