Cipher vs PAGO Networks
Cipher is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; PAGO Networks serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 2 for PAGO Networks (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Cipher is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; PAGO Networks serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 2 for PAGO Networks (Endpoint, Network).
Cipher (Services firm) and PAGO Networks (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cipher's cipher xmdr fits buyers that want a vendor-neutral mdr service backed by prosegur and delivered t... or PAGO Networks's apac-focused mdr with active remediation, multi-vendor edr/xdr support via stellar cyber, dark we....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools | Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CipherTECH-AGNOSTIC | PAGO NetworksTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | SentinelOneDeep Instinct |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Stellar Cyber Open XDR |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Identity | Not offered | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | Not offered |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Cipher does not publish xMDR package pricing. | Custom quotes based on endpoint/device count and coverage scope. No published pricing tiers. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The site names EDR and IPS/IDS integration but does not publish named vendor integrations.. Response wording is broad, so buyers should document pre-approved actions before go-live. | No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.. Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one.. OT/ICS coverage is a separate add-on via a CyberXCenter partnership, not part of the base MDR service.. Most documentation, case studies, and support materials are in Korean. English-language resources are limited. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, xMDR Services, xMDR Platform | Annual |
| Channels | Portal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeLATAM | Asia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Cipher advertises 20 days for full service activation, but buyers should confirm scope and contract timing. | Not published |
| Industry focus | HealthcareProfessional ServicesPayments | ManufacturingChemicalSemiconductorRetailTechnologyFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Cipher's Prosegur ownership, xMDR Platform, 24/7 SOC claim, six-SOC footprint, portal access and existing-stack positioning. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and SOC delivery details directly. | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025). Gartner Peer Insights shows 5.0/5 across 50+ reviews, though most reviewers are from APAC. Great Place To Work certified 2025-2026. Very little visibility in Western cybersecurity communities. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC 1SOC 2PCI DSSCREST | – |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC ISOC IIPCI QSAPCI ASVCRESTTF-CSIRTCIPHER-CSIRT RFC2350 | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025)Great Place To Work Certified 2025-2026 |
| Founded | – | 2017 |
| Data retention | Cipher says all platform information is online 24/7 and available from any device. No public standard MDR data-retention period was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cipher and PAGO Networks?
Cipher is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cipher covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for PAGO Networks.
How do Cipher and PAGO Networks differ in response capabilities?
Cipher supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. PAGO Networks supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Cipher and included with PAGO Networks.
How does Cipher pricing compare to PAGO Networks?
Cipher pricing: Not published. PAGO Networks pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Cipher: Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Watch for with PAGO Networks: No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.; Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one..
Should I choose Cipher or PAGO Networks?
Choose Cipher if: mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools. Choose PAGO Networks if: organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support. Cipher is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. PAGO Networks is not ideal for north American or European organizations needing SOC presence in those regions (PAGO has no operational SOCs there yet).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.