Cipher vs NVISO
Cipher and NVISO are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while NVISO serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 3 for NVISO (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Cipher and NVISO are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while NVISO serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 3 for NVISO (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
NVISO offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 0). Cipher may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools | European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CipherTECH-AGNOSTIC | NVISOTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | Palo Alto CortexMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft SentinelElastic |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Cipher does not publish xMDR package pricing. | Custom pricing based on managed service scope, telemetry sources, portal and ITSM integration, detection analytics, threat hunting, incident response support and platform choices such as Cortex, SentinelOne or Microsoft tooling. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The site names EDR and IPS/IDS integration but does not publish named vendor integrations.. Response wording is broad, so buyers should document pre-approved actions before go-live. | No public price floor or package table was found.. The service is technology-agnostic, but buyers choosing Cortex or Microsoft tooling should price platform licensing separately.. NVISO CSIRT support backs the MDR service, but buyers should confirm which DFIR hours are included and what requires a separate retainer.. The portal exposes SLA status, but public materials do not publish fixed response-time terms or service credits.. No public breach warranty or trial was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, xMDR Services, xMDR Platform | Custom |
| Channels | Portal | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeLATAM | Europe |
| Onboarding | Cipher advertises 20 days for full service activation, but buyers should confirm scope and contract timing. | Not published. Scope depends on telemetry sources, ITSM integration, platform choices and whether NVISO runs a dedicated, co-managed or outsourced operational model. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareProfessional ServicesPayments | Financial ServicesTechnologyGovernmentManufacturingAerospaceCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Cipher's Prosegur ownership, xMDR Platform, 24/7 SOC claim, six-SOC footprint, portal access and existing-stack positioning. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and SOC delivery details directly. | NVISO has credible European security-operations and incident-response evidence, including MITRE managed-services participation and public customer references, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC 1SOC 2PCI DSSCREST | ISO 27001GDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC ISOC IIPCI QSAPCI ASVCRESTTF-CSIRTCIPHER-CSIRT RFC2350 | ISO 27001SOC 2 attestation, type not publishedSOC-CMM Gold PartnerPalo Alto Networks Cortex XMDR SpecializationMicrosoft Intelligent Security Association memberMicrosoft Security Solutions Partner |
| Founded | – | 2013 |
| Data retention | Cipher says all platform information is online 24/7 and available from any device. No public standard MDR data-retention period was found. | Not published for MDR. Retention depends on the customer's monitoring platforms and contract scope. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cipher and NVISO?
Cipher is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NVISO is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cipher covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for NVISO.
How do Cipher and NVISO differ in response capabilities?
Cipher supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. NVISO supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Cipher pricing compare to NVISO?
Cipher pricing: Not published. NVISO pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Cipher: Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Watch for with NVISO: No public price floor or package table was found.; The service is technology-agnostic, but buyers choosing Cortex or Microsoft tooling should price platform licensing separately..
Should I choose Cipher or NVISO?
Choose Cipher if: mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools. Choose NVISO if: european mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm. Cipher is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. NVISO is not ideal for buyers needing public per-endpoint pricing before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.