Cipher vs DeepSeas
Cipher is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; DeepSeas serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 4 for DeepSeas (Endpoint, Cloud, Network, OT/ICS).
Buyer brief
Cipher is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; DeepSeas serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 4 for DeepSeas (Endpoint, Cloud, Network, OT/ICS).
Cipher (Services firm) and DeepSeas (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cipher's cipher xmdr fits buyers that want a vendor-neutral mdr service backed by prosegur and delivered t... or DeepSeas's technology-agnostic mdr with ot/ics coverage, which is rare in this market.
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools | Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CipherTECH-AGNOSTIC | DeepSeasTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOneCarbon Black |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | SplunkMicrosoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Cipher does not publish xMDR package pricing. | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage areas. No published pricing. 1-3 year contract terms. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The site names EDR and IPS/IDS integration but does not publish named vendor integrations.. Response wording is broad, so buyers should document pre-approved actions before go-live. | Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed. Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR. OT/ICS coverage may require Nozomi Networks licensing and separate scoping. CyberFusion SOC (dedicated infrastructure) is a separate, premium offering beyond base MDR+ |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, xMDR Services, xMDR Platform | Annual, Multi-year (1-3 years) |
| Channels | Portal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeLATAM | North America |
| Onboarding | Cipher advertises 20 days for full service activation, but buyers should confirm scope and contract timing. | Not published |
| Industry focus | HealthcareProfessional ServicesPayments | ManufacturingEnergy & UtilitiesCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Cipher's Prosegur ownership, xMDR Platform, 24/7 SOC claim, six-SOC footprint, portal access and existing-stack positioning. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and SOC delivery details directly. | Ranked #1 service-based MDR in the 2024 Frost Radar and listed in Gartner's top 40 MDR providers. Praised for OT/ICS coverage and working with existing tools. Very limited practitioner reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Most validation comes from analyst reports rather than user feedback. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC 1SOC 2PCI DSSCREST | ISO 27001 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC ISOC IIPCI QSAPCI ASVCRESTTF-CSIRTCIPHER-CSIRT RFC2350 | ISO 27001 (certified December 2024, audited by A-LIGN)Nozomi Networks MSSP Elite PartnerMicrosoft PartnerCrowdStrike Integration Partner |
| Founded | – | 2022 |
| Data retention | Cipher says all platform information is online 24/7 and available from any device. No public standard MDR data-retention period was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cipher and DeepSeas?
Cipher is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cipher covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for DeepSeas.
How do Cipher and DeepSeas differ in response capabilities?
Cipher supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. DeepSeas supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does Cipher pricing compare to DeepSeas?
Cipher pricing: Not published. DeepSeas pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cipher: Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Watch for with DeepSeas: Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed; Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR.
Should I choose Cipher or DeepSeas?
Choose Cipher if: mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools. Choose DeepSeas if: mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring. Cipher is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. DeepSeas is not ideal for organizations wanting fully autonomous remediation without pre-approved runbooks.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.