Cipher vs Cyrebro
Cipher is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Cyrebro serves SMB and Mid-market. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 4 for Cyrebro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network).
Buyer brief
Cipher is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Cyrebro serves SMB and Mid-market. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 4 for Cyrebro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network).
Cipher (Services firm) and Cyrebro (Platform vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cipher's cipher xmdr fits buyers that want a vendor-neutral mdr service backed by prosegur and delivered t... or Cyrebro's vendor-neutral mdr with its own detection engine and soar, fast deployment, and reported low fals....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools | SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CipherTECH-AGNOSTIC | CyrebroTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | SentinelOneCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Cyrebro Next-Gen SIEM (native) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Cipher does not publish xMDR package pricing. | Subscription-based. Pricing not publicly disclosed |
| Hidden cost warnings | Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The site names EDR and IPS/IDS integration but does not publish named vendor integrations.. Response wording is broad, so buyers should document pre-approved actions before go-live. | No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call. Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. DFIR and advanced forensic investigations are separate from the MDR subscription. Single-region SOC (Israel) means no follow-the-sun coverage, which may matter for compliance or latency requirements |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, xMDR Services, xMDR Platform | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | Portal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeLATAM | Europe |
| Onboarding | Cipher advertises 20 days for full service activation, but buyers should confirm scope and contract timing. | Hours to deploy |
| Industry focus | HealthcareProfessional ServicesPayments | Financial ServicesTechnologyHealthcareRetailProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published. Vendor claims 'minutes' but provides no measured benchmark. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published. Automated playbooks handle containment but no measured MTTR is available. |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Cipher's Prosegur ownership, xMDR Platform, 24/7 SOC claim, six-SOC footprint, portal access and existing-stack positioning. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and SOC delivery details directly. | G2 rates 4.3/5 from 129 reviews. Gartner has recognized Cyrebro as an emerging detection/response vendor. Users praise low false positive rates and actionable guidance but flag slow support and alert noise before tuning is complete. Almost no Reddit discussion. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC 1SOC 2PCI DSSCREST | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC ISOC IIPCI QSAPCI ASVCRESTTF-CSIRTCIPHER-CSIRT RFC2350 | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPRGoogle Cloud Partner |
| Founded | – | 2013 |
| Data retention | Cipher says all platform information is online 24/7 and available from any device. No public standard MDR data-retention period was found. | Not publicly disclosed |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cipher and Cyrebro?
Cipher is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cipher covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Cyrebro.
How do Cipher and Cyrebro differ in response capabilities?
Cipher supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Cyrebro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Cipher and included with Cyrebro.
How does Cipher pricing compare to Cyrebro?
Cipher pricing: Not published. Cyrebro pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Cipher: Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Watch for with Cyrebro: No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call; Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows.
Should I choose Cipher or Cyrebro?
Choose Cipher if: mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools. Choose Cyrebro if: sMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools. Cipher is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Cyrebro is not ideal for buyers who need US-based SOC operations or follow-the-sun coverage across multiple regions.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.