Check Point vs Northwave
Check Point and Northwave are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Check Point targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Northwave serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Check Point includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Northwave (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Check Point and Northwave are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Check Point targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Northwave serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Check Point includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Northwave (Endpoint, Network).
Check Point offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 2). Northwave may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management | Benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Check PointTECH-AGNOSTIC | NorthwaveTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Check Point Harmony Endpoint | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user subscription with one-year and multi-year plans. Three tiers: MDR (endpoint and API monitoring), MDR 360 (adds identity protection, expanded integrations, XDR/XPR access), MXDR 360 (adds managed SIEM and data lake). | Custom quote. Northwave does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR. Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Identity protection and expanded integrations require the MDR 360 tier, not the base MDR tier. PeerSpot reviewers consistently flag Check Point licensing and support costs as higher than competitors | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. Rapid Response is a separate related service, so buyers should confirm what incident-response support is included in base MDR.. Cloud, SaaS and identity coverage are not named as clearly as endpoint, log and network telemetry.. Detection tuning depends on onboarding log sources and threat-based use cases, which may affect deployment effort. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | 1 year, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Integration via APIs and endpoint agents | Northwave says implementation starts with a plan covering service elements, phases, planning and threat-based use cases, then onboarding log sources and processes. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTelecommunicationsManufacturingCritical InfrastructureRetail | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingLogisticsTechnologyPublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | PeerSpot rates Check Point Infinity 8.8/10 (platform-level, not MDR-specific). Premium pricing, licensing complexity, and technical support delays are persistent complaints across PeerSpot reviews. MDR-specific community feedback is minimal. Most reviews cover the Infinity platform broadly, not the MDR service layer. | Northwave has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on European delivery, Utrecht SOC operations and the connection between MDR, CERT, red team and threat research. Buyers should validate response authority, cloud and identity coverage, pricing and escalation rules before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAAPCI DSS | NIS2ISO 27001GDPRTISAX |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 | – |
| Founded | 1993 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed. MXDR 360 tier includes a data lake for long-term retention and compliance. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Check Point and Northwave?
Check Point is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Northwave is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Check Point covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Northwave.
How do Check Point and Northwave differ in response capabilities?
Check Point supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Northwave supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Check Point and not included with Northwave.
How does Check Point pricing compare to Northwave?
Check Point pricing: Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors.. Northwave pricing: Not published. Watch for with Check Point: ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR; Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Watch for with Northwave: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; Rapid Response is a separate related service, so buyers should confirm what incident-response support is included in base MDR..
Should I choose Check Point or Northwave?
Choose Check Point if: enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management. Choose Northwave if: benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC. Check Point is not ideal for budget-conscious buyers or SMBs who need predictable, transparent pricing. Northwave is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.