Check Point vs Help AG
Check Point and Help AG are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Check Point targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Help AG serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Check Point includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for Help AG ().
Buyer brief
Check Point and Help AG are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Check Point targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Help AG serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Check Point includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for Help AG ().
Check Point offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 0). Help AG may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management | Middle East buyers that want MDR delivered from UAE and KSA sovereign SOCs |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Middle East buyers that want MDR delivered from UAE and KSA sovereign SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Check PointTECH-AGNOSTIC | Help AGTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Check Point Harmony Endpoint | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user subscription with one-year and multi-year plans. Three tiers: MDR (endpoint and API monitoring), MDR 360 (adds identity protection, expanded integrations, XDR/XPR access), MXDR 360 (adds managed SIEM and data lake). | Custom quote. Help AG does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR. Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Identity protection and expanded integrations require the MDR 360 tier, not the base MDR tier. PeerSpot reviewers consistently flag Check Point licensing and support costs as higher than competitors | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is positioned for sovereign UAE and KSA delivery, so buyers outside the region should confirm availability and data-residency architecture.. Response Automation-as-a-Service is named separately, so containment actions, permissions and cost should be written into the quote.. Help AG lists a broad cybersecurity portfolio around MDR, so buyers should separate included MDR scope from SecOps, CTEM, DFIR, advisory and cloud-security projects.. Public pages cite MTTD and MTTR improvement without figures, so buyers should ask for contractual metrics rather than relying on marketing claims. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | 1 year, Multi-year | Custom, Managed Detection and Response, Response Automation-as-a-Service, Digital Forensics and Incident Response |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Middle East |
| Onboarding | Integration via APIs and endpoint agents | Not published. Help AG says Unicorn supports rapid deployment of threat detection content and playbooks, but no standard MDR onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTelecommunicationsManufacturingCritical InfrastructureRetail | GovernmentCritical InfrastructureEnterprise |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | PeerSpot rates Check Point Infinity 8.8/10 (platform-level, not MDR-specific). Premium pricing, licensing complexity, and technical support delays are persistent complaints across PeerSpot reviews. MDR-specific community feedback is minimal. Most reviews cover the Infinity platform broadly, not the MDR service layer. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Help AG's Middle East focus, e& enterprise ownership, sovereign UAE and KSA SOCs, 800+ certified experts, response automation, threat hunting and DFIR integration. Buyers should validate pricing, exact response authority, SLA figures and data-residency terms directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAAPCI DSS | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000-1ISO 27035-2NCASAMADESC |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 | ISO-certified sovereign SOCsISO 27001:2022ISO 22301:2019ISO 20000-1:2018ISO 27035-2:2023SOC CMM Level 3CREST-certified DFIR |
| Founded | 1993 | 2005 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed. MXDR 360 tier includes a data lake for long-term retention and compliance. | Help AG says MDR services are fully delivered within the region and aligned with data-residency and regulatory requirements. No standard public MDR log-retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Check Point and Help AG?
Check Point is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Help AG is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Check Point covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for Help AG.
How do Check Point and Help AG differ in response capabilities?
Check Point supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Help AG supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Check Point pricing compare to Help AG?
Check Point pricing: Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors.. Help AG pricing: Not published. Watch for with Check Point: ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR; Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Watch for with Help AG: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is positioned for sovereign UAE and KSA delivery, so buyers outside the region should confirm availability and data-residency architecture..
Should I choose Check Point or Help AG?
Choose Check Point if: enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management. Choose Help AG if: middle East buyers that want MDR delivered from UAE and KSA sovereign SOCs. Check Point is not ideal for budget-conscious buyers or SMBs who need predictable, transparent pricing. Help AG is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.