Capgemini vs Stoik
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Stoik is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Stoik serves SMB. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 1 for Stoik (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Stoik is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Stoik serves SMB. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 1 for Stoik (Endpoint).
Capgemini (Services firm) and Stoik (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or Stoik's stoik removes the friction of buying cyber insurance and mdr separately by bundling both for euro....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | StoikTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Not coveredIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Identity | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Bundled annual pricing combining cyber insurance and MDR. Price varies by company size, revenue, sector and coverage tier. Sold through 2,000+ broker partners only. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.. MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option.. Sold through broker partners only. No direct purchase from Stoik.. Revenue cap: companies up to 1B EUR turnover (expanded from 750M EUR after CyberContract acquisition in September 2025). |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | CrowdStrike Falcon agent deployment, no minimum endpoint requirement published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | Professional ServicesRetailManufacturingTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Almost no English-language reviews. 10,000+ insured companies and 200%+ YoY growth show market traction in continental Europe. Backed by a16z, Munich Re Ventures and Alven (~$78M raised through Series C in Jan 2026). Practitioner sentiment on MDR quality is impossible to gauge from public sources. |
| Compliance | DORA | GDPR |
| Certifications | – | – |
| Founded | 1967 | 2021 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Stoik?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Stoik is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Stoik.
How do Capgemini and Stoik differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Stoik supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Stoik?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Stoik pricing: Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Stoik: Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.; MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option..
Should I choose Capgemini or Stoik?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Stoik if: european SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Stoik is not ideal for organizations needing active remediation or autonomous containment.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.