Capgemini vs MAD Security
Capgemini and MAD Security are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while MAD Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 1 for MAD Security (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Capgemini and MAD Security are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while MAD Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 1 for MAD Security (Endpoint).
Capgemini offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 1). MAD Security may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Defense contractors and government contractors that need MDR evidence aligned to DFARS, CMMC and NIST requirements |
| Price | Custom quote | MSS example: $24K-$90K/yr; not MDR-only |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Defense contractors and government contractors that need MDR evidence aligned to DFARS, CMMC and NIST requirements
- Price
- MSS example: $24K-$90K/yr; not MDR-only
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | MAD SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. A vendor-published MAD Security cost-comparison PDF gives $24,000-$90,000 per year as an example average for SMB managed security services, but it is not an MDR-specific quote and says pricing varies. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom pricing. MAD Security publishes a broad managed security services cost comparison, but does not publish MDR-specific price bands, minimums, per-endpoint pricing or log-volume pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Confirm whether MDR is quoted as a standalone endpoint service or bundled into SOC-as-a-Service.. Confirm whether NDR, cloud telemetry, identity correlation and OT/IT monitoring are included or separate services.. Ask which tools are included in the MDR fee, since public pages do not name a standard EDR or SIEM platform.. The public $24,000-$90,000 annual example is for managed security services broadly, not a scoped MDR quote.. No public MDR SLA table, service-credit terms or breach warranty were found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | Defense Industrial BaseGovernmentMaritimeState and Local GovernmentFinancial ServicesTechnologyHigher EducationManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | MAD Security has clear regulated-sector positioning and public MSSP Alert recognition, but independent MDR buyer-review signal is thin. No meaningful G2, Gartner Peer Insights or PeerSpot MDR review profile was found in this pass. |
| Compliance | DORA | CMMCDFARSNIST SP 800-171NIST 800-53FISMAFedRAMPMTSACJISHIPAA |
| Certifications | – | CMMC Level 2 CertifiedCMMC Registered Provider OrganizationService-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business |
| Founded | 1967 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and MAD Security?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). MAD Security is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for MAD Security.
How do Capgemini and MAD Security differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. MAD Security supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with MAD Security.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to MAD Security?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. MAD Security pricing: Custom pricing. A vendor-published MAD Security cost-comparison PDF gives $24,000-$90,000 per year as an example average for SMB managed security services, but it is not an MDR-specific quote and says pricing varies.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with MAD Security: Confirm whether MDR is quoted as a standalone endpoint service or bundled into SOC-as-a-Service.; Confirm whether NDR, cloud telemetry, identity correlation and OT/IT monitoring are included or separate services..
Should I choose Capgemini or MAD Security?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose MAD Security if: defense contractors and government contractors that need MDR evidence aligned to DFARS, CMMC and NIST requirements. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. MAD Security is not ideal for buyers that need MDR-specific pricing, minimums and packaged tiers before talking to sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.