Capgemini vs Cyderes
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Cyderes serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Cyderes (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations; Cyderes serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Cyderes (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Capgemini (Services firm) and Cyderes (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Capgemini's capgemini is strongest when mdr is part of a larger enterprise security-operations agenda: manage... or Cyderes's technology-agnostic mdr built on google chronicle with deep identity security integrations and th....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | CyderesTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft DefenderCybereasonPalo Alto CortexMalwarebytes |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel | Google ChronicleSplunk Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom quote-based, not publicly disclosed |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.. Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing.. DFIR is always a separate retainer, not included in base MDR.. Identity-first approach may require upfront IAM assessment and remediation work before MDR is fully operational. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Varies by environment. One enterprise case study references a 6-month parallel migration. Smaller deployments likely faster, but no published timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | Healthcare & Life SciencesFinancial ServicesGaming & EntertainmentRetailLegal ServicesManufacturingPharmaceutical/Biotech |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Gartner Peer Insights 5.0/5 from a single review. No G2 or Capterra listings. PeerSpot ranks #41 in MDR with 0 collected reviews. Glassdoor 3.2/5. Virtually no independent customer validation despite analyst recognition. |
| Compliance | DORA | SOC 2ISO 27001 |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2ISO 27001 |
| Founded | 1967 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Data stored in Google Chronicle/BigQuery. Retention periods customizable per contract. Chronicle provides 12 months of hot data by default. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Cyderes?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Cyderes.
How do Capgemini and Cyderes differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Cyderes supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Cyderes.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Cyderes?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Cyderes pricing: Not publicly disclosed.. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Cyderes: No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.; Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing..
Should I choose Capgemini or Cyderes?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Cyderes if: google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Cyderes is not ideal for sMBs or buyers needing transparent, published pricing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.