Bridewell vs Macnica
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Bridewell targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Bridewell includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Bridewell targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Bridewell includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Bridewell (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Macnica (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Bridewell's strong choice for uk/eu critical national infrastructure needing microsoft-native mdr with ncsc/c... or Macnica's macnica is strongest for japanese buyers that want a local security services partner for soc moni....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations with Microsoft 365 and Azure footprints wanting native Sentinel/Defender XDR managed services | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations with Microsoft 365 and Azure footprints wanting native Sentinel/Defender XDR managed services
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | BridewellTECH-AGNOSTIC | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointCustomer choice of EDR (integrated via Sentinel) | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Customer SIEM and log platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accountsCustom playbooks | IsolateCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage areas, and Microsoft licensing footprint. Offered via Azure Marketplace as managed service. Pricing model not publicly disclosed. | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR, it is a separate 24/7 service. Requires Microsoft Sentinel and Defender XDR licensing (customer cost). OT/ICS coverage requires specialist engagement beyond standard MDR. UK/Europe focus, US expansion underway but limited North American SOC presence historically. I-Tracing merger (May 2025) introduces integration risks during transition period | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeNorth America | APAC |
| Onboarding | Less than a week for MDR capabilities deployment | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. |
| Industry focus | EnergyUtilitiesTransportAviationGovernmentFinancial ServicesCritical National Infrastructure (CNI) | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Limited public reviews due to CNI/government client base where testimonials are restricted. Published case studies from Northern Gas Networks and Manchester Airport Group praise technical depth and organized delivery. No G2/Gartner Peer Insights presence and zero Reddit mentions suggest limited visibility outside UK CNI and public sector markets. Hard to assess independently. | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 9001ISO 22301Cyber Essentials PlusCREST SOCCREST CSIRNCSC AssuredISA/IEC 62443GDPRPCI DSS | – |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 9001ISO 22301Cyber Essentials PlusCREST SOC (SOC accreditation)CREST CSIR (Cyber Security Incident Response)CREST Intelligence-led Penetration TestingCREST Penetration TestingCREST Vulnerability AssessmentCREST Incident ExercisingNCSC CHECK (penetration testing)NCSC CIR (Cyber Incident Response, Standard Level)NCSC CIE (Cyber Incident Exercising)NCSC Cyber Resilience AuditNCSC Risk Management ConsultancyNCSC Audit and ReviewNCSC Security Architecture ConsultancyMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security (Cloud Security and Threat Protection specialisms)Microsoft Verified Managed XDR Solution | – |
| Founded | 2013 | – |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed. Determined by customer's own Microsoft Sentinel workspace retention settings and contract terms. | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Bridewell and Macnica?
Bridewell is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Bridewell covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Macnica.
How do Bridewell and Macnica differ in response capabilities?
Bridewell supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does Bridewell pricing compare to Macnica?
Bridewell pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Macnica pricing: Not published. Watch for with Bridewell: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR, it is a separate 24/7 service; Requires Microsoft Sentinel and Defender XDR licensing (customer cost). Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR..
Should I choose Bridewell or Macnica?
Choose Bridewell if: uK and European Critical National Infrastructure organizations (energy, transport, utilities, government) needing NCSC/CREST-assured MDR. Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Bridewell is not ideal for organizations requiring multi-vendor, platform-agnostic MDR beyond the Microsoft ecosystem. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.