BlueVoyant vs CyberMaxx
BlueVoyant and CyberMaxx are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while CyberMaxx serves Mid-market and Enterprise. BlueVoyant includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 1 for CyberMaxx (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
BlueVoyant and CyberMaxx are both Pure-play MDRs that work with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while CyberMaxx serves Mid-market and Enterprise. BlueVoyant includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 1 for CyberMaxx (Endpoint).
BlueVoyant offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 1). CyberMaxx may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | BlueVoyantTECH-AGNOSTIC | CyberMaxxTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeCarbon Black Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne | CrowdStrike Falcon SentinelOne, Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel Splunk | ElasticExabeamDevoLevelBlueCustomer-provided SIEM Splunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Isolate |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Contact for custom quote. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Subscription-based, priced per endpoint for laptops, workstations, and servers. All log sources included in the per-endpoint price. Also available via AWS Marketplace and Azure Marketplace. | Three-tier pricing structure (Core, Advanced, Elite). Pricing varies by tier, environment size, EDR platform choice, and SIEM deployment model (managed vs. co-managed). Custom quotes based on coverage scope. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing. Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Very few public reviews (6 on Gartner, 0 on PeerSpot) make it hard to validate claims before buying. No published response time SLA. Ask for written commitments before signing | Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.. Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. EDR platform licenses (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender) are required and not included in the MDR price.. Core tier only covers endpoints OR cloud email, not both. Advanced required for combined coverage.. Three acquisitions in two years. Ask how consolidated the tooling and SOC operations actually are today. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmail | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Deployment involves configuring data connectors and playbooks within the customer's existing SIEM. | Under two months for full MDR ramp-up |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentDefense | HealthcareFinancial ServicesState and Local GovernmentEducation |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published as an absolute figure. Forrester TEI study (Sep 2024) found 70% reduction in mean time to resolution for BlueVoyant MDR clients. | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.5/5 (6 reviews). Named in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for MDR. Strong Microsoft credentials (Partner of the Year, 500+ Sentinel deployments). Very limited public review data makes independent validation difficult. | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (15 reviews in MDR category). MSSP Alert Top 250 provider (Top 50 in 2023). Small review sample compared to peers like Arctic Wolf (451+ reviews) or Expel (142 reviews). Praised for customer support and healthcare expertise. Almost no Reddit or G2 discussion. Three acquisitions in two years (CipherTechs 2023, Cybersafe and onShore Security Jan 2025) suggest rapid growth but integration risk is real. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type IIHIPAA-aligned services |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (annual audit)Microsoft Worldwide Security Partner of the Year 2024Three-time Microsoft US Security Partner of the YearUK G-Cloud accreditedSplunk Premier Manage partner | SOC 2 Type II (audited by Insyte CPAs, LLC) |
| Founded | 2017 | 2002 |
| Data retention | Data stays in customer's own SIEM instance. Retention governed by customer's Sentinel/Splunk configuration. | Not published. Varies by SIEM platform and customer contract. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between BlueVoyant and CyberMaxx?
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). BlueVoyant covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for CyberMaxx.
How do BlueVoyant and CyberMaxx differ in response capabilities?
BlueVoyant supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. CyberMaxx supports 1 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does BlueVoyant pricing compare to CyberMaxx?
BlueVoyant pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. CyberMaxx pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with BlueVoyant: Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing; Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Watch for with CyberMaxx: Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.; Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page..
Should I choose BlueVoyant or CyberMaxx?
Choose BlueVoyant if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender wanting MDR without a proprietary agent. Choose CyberMaxx if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise. BlueVoyant is not ideal for organizations needing broad multi-vendor integration support. BlueVoyant supports four EDR platforms and two SIEMs, far fewer than competitors like Expel or eSentire. CyberMaxx is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics or MITRE-validated detection to satisfy internal stakeholders.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.