Avertium vs SISA ProACT
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Avertium includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Avertium includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Avertium (Pure-play MDR) and SISA ProACT (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Avertium's technology-agnostic mdr with deep microsoft, logrhythm, and sentinelone expertise or SISA ProACT's sisa proact fits payment-sector buyers that want mdr tied to forensics, pci expertise and ai-assi....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AvertiumTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelLogRhythm NextGen SIEM | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage scope (endpoints, cloud, users), and platform choice. Annual subscription. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own. Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). No published pricing, requires custom quote for accurate cost comparison. Platform choice (Microsoft vs LogRhythm vs SentinelOne) significantly impacts total cost due to differing license models. Full DFIR (digital forensics and incident response) is a separate retainer or on-demand engagement, not included in base Fusion MXDR | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | |
| Onboarding | Not published. Varies by platform and environment size. | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingRetailHospitalityPublic Sector | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (89 reviews for managed security services). Customers praise knowledgeable staff and flexible, tailored service. Limited public reviews compared to larger MDR providers. Glassdoor 4.4/5 (68 reviews), with 84% recommending to a friend. Minimal Reddit or G2 presence, making independent validation harder. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | HIPAA (consulting services for customer compliance)PCI DSS (consulting services for customer compliance)NIST (consulting services for customer compliance)HITRUST (consulting services for customer compliance) | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified MXDR Solution Status (April 2025)Microsoft Intelligent Security Association (MISA) memberMicrosoft Security Excellence Award 2026 winner, Security Trailblazer category (January 2026) | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2019 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by underlying platform (Microsoft, LogRhythm, SentinelOne) | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Avertium and SISA ProACT?
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Avertium covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do Avertium and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
Avertium supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Avertium pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
Avertium pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with Avertium: Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own; Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose Avertium or SISA ProACT?
Choose Avertium if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already committed to Microsoft Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne wanting managed SOC services. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. Avertium is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations needing transparent, published pricing and lower minimums. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.