Avertium vs Innofactor MDRaaS
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Innofactor MDRaaS serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Avertium includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 1 for Innofactor MDRaaS (Cloud).
Buyer brief
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Innofactor MDRaaS serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Avertium includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 1 for Innofactor MDRaaS (Cloud).
Avertium (Pure-play MDR) and Innofactor MDRaaS (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Avertium's technology-agnostic mdr with deep microsoft, logrhythm, and sentinelone expertise or Innofactor MDRaaS's innofactor mdraas fits microsoft-heavy nordic buyers that want sentinel-based monitoring while ke....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor | Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AvertiumTECH-AGNOSTIC | Innofactor MDRaaSTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | LogRhythm NextGen SIEM Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | Not offered |
| Network | + Optional | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage scope (endpoints, cloud, users), and platform choice. Annual subscription. | Tiered custom quote. Innofactor publishes Basic, Standard and Advanced MDRaaS tiers, each marked ask for pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own. Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). No published pricing, requires custom quote for accurate cost comparison. Platform choice (Microsoft vs LogRhythm vs SentinelOne) significantly impacts total cost due to differing license models. Full DFIR (digital forensics and incident response) is a separate retainer or on-demand engagement, not included in base Fusion MXDR | Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.. Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Public pages do not publish named response actions or response SLAs.. Customers keep ownership of logs and incidents, so internal responsibility for mitigation should be clear before signing. |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Annual | Tier1 Basic, Tier2 Standard, Tier3 Advanced, Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhonePortal |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Varies by platform and environment size. | Innofactor says the core infrastructure resides in the customer's Azure cloud environment and needs no on-premises infrastructure. It describes deployment as rapid and light, but does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingRetailHospitalityPublic Sector | Public SectorFinancial ServicesTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (89 reviews for managed security services). Customers praise knowledgeable staff and flexible, tailored service. Limited public reviews compared to larger MDR providers. Glassdoor 4.4/5 (68 reviews), with 84% recommending to a friend. Minimal Reddit or G2 presence, making independent validation harder. | Innofactor has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Nordic Microsoft expertise, Sentinel in the customer's Azure environment, tiered service levels and clear customer control of logs and incidents. Buyers should validate response authority, total licensing cost, add-on scope and Tier3 operating model before signing. |
| Compliance | HIPAA (consulting services for customer compliance)PCI DSS (consulting services for customer compliance)NIST (consulting services for customer compliance)HITRUST (consulting services for customer compliance) | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 13485AQAP-2110ISO 14001 |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified MXDR Solution Status (April 2025)Microsoft Intelligent Security Association (MISA) memberMicrosoft Security Excellence Award 2026 winner, Security Trailblazer category (January 2026) | ISO 9001:2015ISO 13485:2016ISO/IEC 27001:2022AQAP-2110ISO 14001:2015Microsoft Solution Partner designationsMicrosoft Advanced Specializations |
| Founded | 2019 | 2000 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by underlying platform (Microsoft, LogRhythm, SentinelOne) | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Innofactor says logs and incidents remain in the customer's own Azure environment. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Avertium and Innofactor MDRaaS?
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Avertium covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Innofactor MDRaaS.
How do Avertium and Innofactor MDRaaS differ in response capabilities?
Avertium supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Innofactor MDRaaS supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting.
How does Avertium pricing compare to Innofactor MDRaaS?
Avertium pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Innofactor MDRaaS pricing: Not published. Watch for with Avertium: Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own; Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). Watch for with Innofactor MDRaaS: Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.; Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect..
Should I choose Avertium or Innofactor MDRaaS?
Choose Avertium if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already committed to Microsoft Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne wanting managed SOC services. Choose Innofactor MDRaaS if: nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel. Avertium is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations needing transparent, published pricing and lower minimums. Innofactor MDRaaS is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.