At-Bay Stance MDR vs Wirespeed
At-Bay Stance MDR and Wirespeed are both Cyber insurers. At-Bay Stance MDR requires its own security platform and targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while Wirespeed works with your existing tools and serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
At-Bay Stance MDR and Wirespeed are both Cyber insurers. At-Bay Stance MDR requires its own security platform and targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while Wirespeed works with your existing tools and serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
At-Bay Stance MDR is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Wirespeed is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · No approval | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | At-Bay Stance MDRPLATFORM | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOne | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for EndpointPalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft SentinelGeneric Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Fully Autonomous | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContain | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Packages page offers an estimated MDR cost flow and ties MDR to insurance package enhancements, but no public fixed price bands were found. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.. Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found despite under-15-minute containment claims.. Specific EDR/email/cloud technologies and data export options should be confirmed in writing. | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmail | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | |
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard timeline. Customer testimonials say onboarding was quick and did not require complex setup or internal playbooks. | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | Cyber InsuranceProfessional ServicesTechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetail | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes from detection to containment on average (vendor-reported) | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | At-Bay has strong first-party customer testimonials on MDR pages, but little independent public MDR review signal was found in this pass. The market story is current and differentiated through InsurSec, SentinelOne partnership, claims data, and MSP channel materials, but buyer validation should rely on references until more third-party MDR reviews accumulate. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2016 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published. Trust page states data is processed and stored exclusively in AWS data centers in the United States. | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between At-Bay Stance MDR and Wirespeed?
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). At-Bay Stance MDR covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do At-Bay Stance MDR and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
At-Bay Stance MDR supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does At-Bay Stance MDR pricing compare to Wirespeed?
At-Bay Stance MDR pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with At-Bay Stance MDR: Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.; Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose At-Bay Stance MDR or Wirespeed?
Choose At-Bay Stance MDR if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. At-Bay Stance MDR is not ideal for large enterprises needing published global SOC locations, formal SLA tables and mature third-party analyst validation. Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.