At-Bay Stance MDR vs Devoteam
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. Devoteam is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. At-Bay Stance MDR targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Devoteam serves Mid-market and Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Devoteam (Cloud, Identity).
Buyer brief
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. Devoteam is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. At-Bay Stance MDR targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Devoteam serves Mid-market and Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Devoteam (Cloud, Identity).
At-Bay Stance MDR is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Devoteam is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage | European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · No approval | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | At-Bay Stance MDRPLATFORM | DevoteamTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOne | Microsoft security toolsCustomer endpoint security tools |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platformsGoogle Security Operations |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Fully Autonomous | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContain | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Packages page offers an estimated MDR cost flow and ties MDR to insurance package enhancements, but no public fixed price bands were found. | Custom quote for cloud managed services and managed security. Public MDR prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.. Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found despite under-15-minute containment claims.. Specific EDR/email/cloud technologies and data export options should be confirmed in writing. | Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. The service is cloud-centered; teams seeking a packaged endpoint MDR with named containment actions should validate endpoint tooling and response scope.. Devoteam has separate cloud, cybersecurity, Microsoft, AWS and Google Cloud offerings, so scope boundaries between MDR, cloud managed services and advisory work should be written into the contract.. Offboarding terms for SIEM detections, automation scripts, reports and retained logs are not described publicly. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom cloud managed services engagement, Managed Security, Cloud Managed Services, Managed Detection and Response |
| Channels | PortalEmail | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | |
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard timeline. Customer testimonials say onboarding was quick and did not require complex setup or internal playbooks. | Not published. Devoteam describes SIEM platform design and implementation, Infrastructure as Code deployment and managed cloud/security operations, but no standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Cyber InsuranceProfessional ServicesTechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetail | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailTelecommunicationsManufacturingPublic SectorHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes from detection to containment on average (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| Community view | At-Bay has strong first-party customer testimonials on MDR pages, but little independent public MDR review signal was found in this pass. The market story is current and differentiated through InsurSec, SentinelOne partnership, claims data, and MSP channel materials, but buyer validation should rely on references until more third-party MDR reviews accumulate. | Devoteam has solid vendor-controlled evidence for cloud MDR, 24x7 monitoring, Sentinel-centered SIEM operations, SOAR automation and multi-cloud security partnerships. Independent MDR-specific buyer reviews are limited, so buyers should validate SOC delivery quality, response authority, cloud log costs and actual managed-service boundaries through references. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | GDPRPCI DSSANSSICloud Security AllianceISO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | AWS Premier Consulting PartnerAWS Managed Services ProviderGoogle Cloud Diamond PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Security Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Security Services Specialized partnerMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Azure Expert MSP |
| Founded | 2016 | – |
| Data retention | Not published. Trust page states data is processed and stored exclusively in AWS data centers in the United States. | Not published for MDR. Devoteam describes outsourced SIEM platform operations and cloud-managed services, but public pages do not publish default log retention, hot/warm storage or export terms. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between At-Bay Stance MDR and Devoteam?
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Devoteam is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). At-Bay Stance MDR covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Devoteam.
How do At-Bay Stance MDR and Devoteam differ in response capabilities?
At-Bay Stance MDR supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval. Devoteam supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does At-Bay Stance MDR pricing compare to Devoteam?
At-Bay Stance MDR pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Devoteam pricing: Not published. Watch for with At-Bay Stance MDR: Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.; Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. Watch for with Devoteam: Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose At-Bay Stance MDR or Devoteam?
Choose At-Bay Stance MDR if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage. Choose Devoteam if: european and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm. At-Bay Stance MDR is not ideal for large enterprises needing published global SOC locations, formal SLA tables and mature third-party analyst validation. Devoteam is not ideal for buyers that require public per-endpoint MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.