Armor vs Ensign InfoSecurity
Armor is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Armor targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Ensign InfoSecurity serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Armor is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Armor targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Ensign InfoSecurity serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Armor is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Ensign InfoSecurity is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Healthcare or financial services teams already running Microsoft Sentinel who need compliance consulting baked in | Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC |
| Price | XDR+SOC estimate: from ~$4,317/mo | Not published |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Healthcare or financial services teams already running Microsoft Sentinel who need compliance consulting baked in
- Price
- XDR+SOC estimate: from ~$4,317/mo
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | ArmorPLATFORM | Ensign InfoSecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Armor Anywhere Agent (Trend Micro)Microsoft Defender | Cybereason |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | IsolateContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Starting at ~$4,317/month for XDR+SOC (per SourceForge listing) | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing, platform subscription model | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage scope. IR retainer is separate: Essentials (USD 2,000/year, 10 hours), Standard (100-hour blocks), or Ad-hoc. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Armor Anywhere agent is built on Trend Micro. Running it alongside CrowdStrike or SentinelOne may cause conflicts, forcing a swap.. Compliance consulting (HIPAA readiness, HITRUST prep) is billed as professional services on top of the MDR subscription.. Full coverage assumes Microsoft Sentinel and Defender XDR are already licensed. Those Microsoft costs are yours.. No macOS or mobile agent support. If you have Apple endpoints, you need a separate tool. | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.. 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs.. Pricing requires custom quote. No published per-endpoint or per-user rates for comparison shopping.. Cybereason EDR is the default platform. Unclear what the cost or support impact is if you use a different EDR vendor.. Ad-hoc IR retainer has no upfront cost but standard-priced manhours and longer onboarding. You pay more per hour in a crisis. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaAsia-Pacific | Asia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not publicly disclosed | Not published |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesRetailInsuranceUtilitiesSaaS/Technology | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareManufacturingTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Almost no public review footprint. G2 shows 4.8/5 but from only 12 reviews, and Gartner Peer Insights has none. Employee reviews on Indeed raise leadership and strategy concerns. Frost & Sullivan included Armor in their 2025 Top 20 MDR list, but that is analyst recognition, not customer validation. | MSSP Alert Top 250: top 10 globally and #1 in APAC for the fourth consecutive year (2025 list). No G2 or PeerSpot product reviews found. Glassdoor employee reviews average 3.4/5 (268 reviews). Industry recognition is strong within APAC, but almost zero practitioner discussion outside the region. |
| Compliance | PCI DSSHIPAAHITRUSTISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701GDPRFedRAMPNISTSEC | ISO 27001PCI DSS |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701MISA Member (Microsoft)Microsoft Advanced Specialization: Threat ProtectionMicrosoft Advanced Specialization: Cloud Security | ISO 27001PCI DSSOSPAR (SOC attestation) |
| Founded | 2009 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Not published |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Armor and Ensign InfoSecurity?
Armor is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Armor and Ensign InfoSecurity differ in response capabilities?
Armor supports 4 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment) and approval is configurable. Ensign InfoSecurity supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is included with Armor and not included with Ensign InfoSecurity.
How does Armor pricing compare to Ensign InfoSecurity?
Armor pricing: Starting at ~$4,317/month for XDR+SOC (per SourceForge listing). Ensign InfoSecurity pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Armor: Armor Anywhere agent is built on Trend Micro. Running it alongside CrowdStrike or SentinelOne may cause conflicts, forcing a swap.; Compliance consulting (HIPAA readiness, HITRUST prep) is billed as professional services on top of the MDR subscription.. Watch for with Ensign InfoSecurity: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.; 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs..
Should I choose Armor or Ensign InfoSecurity?
Choose Armor if: healthcare or financial services teams already running Microsoft Sentinel who need compliance consulting baked in. Choose Ensign InfoSecurity if: mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC. Armor is not ideal for teams running macOS or mobile-heavy environments with no agent support for either. Ensign InfoSecurity is not ideal for north American or European organizations without APAC operations.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.