Truesec vs Wirespeed
Truesec is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Truesec targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Truesec includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Truesec is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Truesec targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Truesec includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Truesec (Services firm) and Wirespeed (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Truesec's largest nordic soc with deep ir background (120,000+ hours, vendor-stated) or Wirespeed's wirespeed is most interesting as an automated mdr layer for msps, lean security teams and coaliti....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | TruesecTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikePalo Alto Cortex SentinelOne | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for EndpointPalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | CrowdStrike Falcon LogScaleSplunk Microsoft Sentinel | Generic Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Fixed fee per endpoint. No log volume or retention surcharges. No public pricing for any tier. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing for any tier, requires sales engagement for any estimate. IR is a separate retainer on Core and Enterprise, only Black includes it. US customers may get a different experience since bulk of 350+ specialists are in Europe | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhoneTeamsSlack | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeNorth America | North America |
| Onboarding | 72 hours for Core and Enterprise. Black tier not disclosed. | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareEnergyCritical Infrastructure | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | Effectively unrateable. No public reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Not in Forrester Wave or Gartner MQ for MDR. No Reddit mentions. Strong Nordic reputation based on vendor claims and partner references (EY, Microsoft MISA), but impossible to validate through independent peer feedback. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 14001MISA (Microsoft Intelligent Security Association) | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 14001 | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2005 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Included in fixed fee, no log volume or retention surcharges. Specific retention periods not disclosed. | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Truesec and Wirespeed?
Truesec is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Truesec covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do Truesec and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
Truesec supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does Truesec pricing compare to Wirespeed?
Truesec pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with Truesec: No public pricing for any tier, requires sales engagement for any estimate; IR is a separate retainer on Core and Enterprise, only Black includes it. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose Truesec or Wirespeed?
Choose Truesec if: nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. Truesec is not ideal for uS-based organizations wanting a fully staffed local SOC (bulk of specialists in Europe). Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.