Tata Communications vs ThreatLocker: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Tata Communications and ThreatLocker managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Tie
Same speed
Coverage Breadth
Tata Communications
6 vs 3 surfaces
Integrations
Tata Communications
More integration options
Criteria
Global telecom giant offering massive-scale MDR with 950+ connectors, 80+ SOAR playbooks, and MITRE ATT&CK alignment. Ideal for Fortune 500 and multinational enterprises needing coverage across 190+ countries with IT/OT convergence.
Unmatched price-to-value ratio for Zero Trust MDR. The $2-5/user pricing with 60-second response time makes it the most affordable MDR option, ideal for MSPs and SMBs already using or willing to adopt ThreatLocker.
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
Configurable
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✓
✓
Kill Process
✓
✓
IR Included
✓ Included
Separate
Response SLA
Performance-based SLAs (contact for specifics)
60-second average response time
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
EmailPortalPhone
EmailPortalPhone
Data Access
Dashboards
Dashboards
Model
Flexible: EPS-based, MPS-based, data-ingested, or devices/users
Per-user per-month tiered pricing
Price Range
Not published
$2-$5 per user per month for MDR add-on
Minimum Seats
None
None
Threat Hunting
✓ Included
Extra cost
Overall
Positive
Very Positive
Summary
IDC MarketScape Major Player. KuppingerCole Leadership Compass leader. Strong reputation among Fortune 500 and large enterprises in APAC and EMEA. Limited Western market community feedback. Known for massive scale and global infrastructure.
9.2/10 on PeerSpot with 100% willingness to recommend. MSPs praise the value proposition and support quality. Zero Trust approach is highly regarded. Interface speed and complexity are noted concerns.
Tata Communications vs ThreatLocker: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Tata Communications if:
- You need active remediation
- Performance-based SLAs (contact for specifics) response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose ThreatLocker if:
- You need active remediation
- 60-second average response time response time meets your needs
- You prefer platform native solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / SMB / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Tata Communications and ThreatLocker?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (Performance-based SLAs (contact for specifics) vs 60-second average response time), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Platform Native).