Sophos vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
Sophos (Services firm) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Sophos works with your existing tools, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. Sophos targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Sophos includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Sophos vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Sophos if:
- •SMBs and mid-market organizations seeking an all-in-one MDR with inclusive IR
- •Organizations with diverse, multi-vendor security stacks needing broad integration support
- •Companies wanting straightforward pricing with predictable costs
- •You need SaaS and Identity and Network and OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Sophos offers one, ThreatDown does not)
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Sophos is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Sophos and ThreatDown?
Sophos is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Sophos offers ≤15 minutes, ThreatDown offers Not disclosed. Sophos covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Sophos and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Sophos supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Sophos and not included with ThreatDown.
How does Sophos pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Sophos pricing: Custom quote required; tiered pricing bands (10-24, 25-49, 50-99, etc.) (10-seat minimum). ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Sophos: MDR Essentials does NOT include breach warranty or full incident response — those require MDR Complete; Linux server protection requires separate Sophos Workload Protection subscription. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Sophos or ThreatDown?
Choose Sophos if: sMBs and mid-market organizations seeking an all-in-one MDR with inclusive IR. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Sophos is not ideal for large enterprises needing deep, custom detection engineering. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).