SentinelOne vs Todyl: MDR Comparison 2026
SentinelOne (EDR vendor) and Todyl (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. SentinelOne requires its own security platform, while Todyl requires its own security platform. SentinelOne targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl focuses on SMB and Mid-market. SentinelOne includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
SentinelOne vs Todyl: Which Should You Choose?
Choose SentinelOne if:
- •Organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting $1M breach response warranty as financial backstop
- •Organizations valuing AI-first detection with Purple AI and Google Threat Intelligence integration
- •Breach warranty matters to you (SentinelOne offers one, Todyl does not)
Choose Todyl if:
- •MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management
- •SMBs with lean security teams wanting a dedicated security contact (DRAM) at an accessible price point
- •Greenfield deployments with no existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments to preserve
- •You need SaaS and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: SentinelOne (EDR vendor) and Todyl (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize SentinelOne's platform-native mdr for sentinelone customers or Todyl's sase, edr, siem, mxdr, soar, and grc in a single agent with a dedicated dram per customer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between SentinelOne and Todyl?
SentinelOne is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Todyl is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: SentinelOne offers ≤1 hour, Todyl offers Not disclosed. SentinelOne covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Todyl.
How do SentinelOne and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
SentinelOne supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does SentinelOne pricing compare to Todyl?
SentinelOne pricing: MDR add-on: ~$17-35/endpoint/year (standard) or ~$35-50/endpoint/year (Pro/Elite). Total: ~$197-280/endpoint/year for platform + MDR. Example: 1,000 endpoints x $35 MDR x 5 years = ~$175K MDR add-on cost.. Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with SentinelOne: Platform license ($69.99-$229.99/endpoint/year) is required BEFORE MDR — significant prerequisite cost; MDR pricing is a bolt-on fee separate from platform licensing — not shown on public pricing page. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in -- must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base -- unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose SentinelOne or Todyl?
Choose SentinelOne if: organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management. SentinelOne is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or any non-SentinelOne EDR — platform-native lock-in. Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments -- requires full Todyl stack adoption.