SentinelOne vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
SentinelOne (EDR vendor) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. SentinelOne requires its own security platform, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. SentinelOne targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. SentinelOne includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
SentinelOne vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose SentinelOne if:
- •Organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting $1M breach response warranty as financial backstop
- •Organizations valuing AI-first detection with Purple AI and Google Threat Intelligence integration
- •You need Cloud and Identity coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (SentinelOne offers one, ThreatDown does not)
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: SentinelOne (EDR vendor) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize SentinelOne's platform-native mdr for sentinelone customers or ThreatDown's one of the most affordable mdr options with fully published pricing ($99/endpoint/year).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between SentinelOne and ThreatDown?
SentinelOne is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: SentinelOne offers ≤1 hour, ThreatDown offers Not disclosed. SentinelOne covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do SentinelOne and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
SentinelOne supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does SentinelOne pricing compare to ThreatDown?
SentinelOne pricing: MDR add-on: ~$17-35/endpoint/year (standard) or ~$35-50/endpoint/year (Pro/Elite). Total: ~$197-280/endpoint/year for platform + MDR. Example: 1,000 endpoints x $35 MDR x 5 years = ~$175K MDR add-on cost.. ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with SentinelOne: Platform license ($69.99-$229.99/endpoint/year) is required BEFORE MDR — significant prerequisite cost; MDR pricing is a bolt-on fee separate from platform licensing — not shown on public pricing page. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose SentinelOne or ThreatDown?
Choose SentinelOne if: organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). SentinelOne is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or any non-SentinelOne EDR — platform-native lock-in. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).