ReliaQuest vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
ReliaQuest (Pure-play MDR) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. ReliaQuest works with your existing tools, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. ReliaQuest targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. ReliaQuest includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
ReliaQuest vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose ReliaQuest if:
- •Large enterprises with complex multi-vendor security stacks
- •Organizations wanting to keep existing SIEM/EDR investments
- •Security teams needing AI-driven automation at scale
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network and OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. ReliaQuest is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between ReliaQuest and ThreatDown?
ReliaQuest is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: ReliaQuest offers ≤15 minutes, ThreatDown offers Not disclosed. ReliaQuest covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do ReliaQuest and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
ReliaQuest supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with ReliaQuest and not included with ThreatDown.
How does ReliaQuest pricing compare to ThreatDown?
ReliaQuest pricing: $172,500 average annual; up to $1,200,000 for large deployments. $5,000 per additional integrated technology.. ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with ReliaQuest: High minimum contract value (enterprise-focused); Additional technology integrations add cost quickly. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose ReliaQuest or ThreatDown?
Choose ReliaQuest if: large enterprises with complex multi-vendor security stacks. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). ReliaQuest is not ideal for sMBs with limited security budgets. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).