PAGO Networks vs Wirespeed
PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. PAGO Networks includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. PAGO Networks includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
PAGO Networks (Pure-play MDR) and Wirespeed (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize PAGO Networks's apac-focused mdr with active remediation, multi-vendor edr/xdr support via stellar cyber, dark we... or Wirespeed's wirespeed is most interesting as an automated mdr layer for msps, lean security teams and coaliti....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PAGO NetworksTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Deep Instinct SentinelOne | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for EndpointPalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Stellar Cyber Open XDR | Microsoft SentinelGeneric Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quotes based on endpoint/device count and coverage scope. No published pricing tiers. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.. Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one.. OT/ICS coverage is a separate add-on via a CyberXCenter partnership, not part of the base MDR service.. Most documentation, case studies, and support materials are in Korean. English-language resources are limited. | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-Pacific | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingChemicalSemiconductorRetailTechnologyFinancial Services | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025). Gartner Peer Insights shows 5.0/5 across 50+ reviews, though most reviewers are from APAC. Great Place To Work certified 2025-2026. Very little visibility in Western cybersecurity communities. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | – | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025)Great Place To Work Certified 2025-2026 | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2017 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between PAGO Networks and Wirespeed?
PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). PAGO Networks covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do PAGO Networks and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
PAGO Networks supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with PAGO Networks and not included with Wirespeed.
How does PAGO Networks pricing compare to Wirespeed?
PAGO Networks pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with PAGO Networks: No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.; Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one.. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose PAGO Networks or Wirespeed?
Choose PAGO Networks if: organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. PAGO Networks is not ideal for north American or European organizations needing SOC presence in those regions (PAGO has no operational SOCs there yet). Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.