Northwave vs NRI SecureTechnologies
Northwave and NRI SecureTechnologies are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Northwave targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while NRI SecureTechnologies serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Northwave includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for NRI SecureTechnologies (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Northwave and NRI SecureTechnologies are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Northwave targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while NRI SecureTechnologies serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Northwave includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for NRI SecureTechnologies (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
NRI SecureTechnologies offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 2). Northwave may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC | Japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | NorthwaveTECH-AGNOSTIC | NRI SecureTechnologiesTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Northwave does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom quote, varies by monitoring scope, license count, users and support duration. Sold direct. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. Rapid Response is a separate related service, so buyers should confirm what incident-response support is included in base MDR.. Cloud, SaaS and identity coverage are not named as clearly as endpoint, log and network telemetry.. Detection tuning depends on onboarding log sources and threat-based use cases, which may affect deployment effort. | Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation. Contractual SLA language must be requested, no default response time is published. Detection metrics are not published, customers cannot benchmark MTTD or MTTR ahead of signing |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | Asia-PacificNorth America |
| Onboarding | Northwave says implementation starts with a plan covering service elements, phases, planning and threat-based use cases, then onboarding log sources and processes. No standard public onboarding duration was found. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingLogisticsTechnologyPublic SectorCritical Infrastructure | Financial ServicesGovernmentManufacturingPharmaceuticalsRetailMedia |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Northwave has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on European delivery, Utrecht SOC operations and the connection between MDR, CERT, red team and threat research. Buyers should validate response authority, cloud and identity coverage, pricing and escalation rules before signing. | NRI Secure has very limited English-language community review presence on G2, Gartner Peer Insights and PeerSpot for its MDR service specifically. Most public references come from Japanese enterprise press and NRI Group communications rather than independent buyer reviews. Buyers will need direct customer references. |
| Compliance | NIS2ISO 27001GDPRTISAX | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type II (NRI Secure North America Branch, Oct 2023) |
| Founded | 2006 | 2000 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Northwave and NRI SecureTechnologies?
Northwave is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NRI SecureTechnologies is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Northwave covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for NRI SecureTechnologies.
How do Northwave and NRI SecureTechnologies differ in response capabilities?
Northwave supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. NRI SecureTechnologies supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Northwave and included with NRI SecureTechnologies.
How does Northwave pricing compare to NRI SecureTechnologies?
Northwave pricing: Not published. NRI SecureTechnologies pricing: Not published. Watch for with Northwave: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; Rapid Response is a separate related service, so buyers should confirm what incident-response support is included in base MDR.. Watch for with NRI SecureTechnologies: Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation; Contractual SLA language must be requested, no default response time is published.
Should I choose Northwave or NRI SecureTechnologies?
Choose Northwave if: benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC. Choose NRI SecureTechnologies if: japanese enterprises and APJ subsidiaries that want a Tokyo-headquartered SOC and Japanese-language support. Northwave is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before engaging sales. NRI SecureTechnologies is not ideal for buyers who need published SLA commitments and independently validated detection metrics.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.