N-able vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
N-able (MSP-channel) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. N-able works with your existing tools, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. N-able targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. N-able includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
N-able vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose N-able if:
- •MSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA
- •SMBs and mid-market needing breach warranty protection
- •Organizations wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that works with existing EDR
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (N-able offers one, ThreatDown does not)
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. N-able is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between N-able and ThreatDown?
N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). N-able covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do N-able and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with N-able and not included with ThreatDown.
How does N-able pricing compare to ThreatDown?
N-able pricing: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs including MDR. ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with N-able: Pricing designed for MSP channel; direct pricing may differ; MDR Base is identity-focused only; Complete needed for full coverage. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose N-able or ThreatDown?
Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).