N-able vs ThreatDown
N-able is a MSP-channel that works with your existing tools. ThreatDown is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. N-able targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ThreatDown serves SMB and Mid-market. N-able includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
N-able is a MSP-channel that works with your existing tools. ThreatDown is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. N-able targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ThreatDown serves SMB and Mid-market. N-able includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. N-able is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | MSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl | SMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing |
| Price | MSP security bundle: $90-$275/user/mo; not Adlumin standalone | $99/endpoint/yr |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Own agent required | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | $500,000 | None listed |
- Best fit
- MSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl
- Price
- MSP security bundle: $90-$275/user/mo; not Adlumin standalone
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- $500,000
- Best fit
- SMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing
- Price
- $99/endpoint/yr
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | N-ableTECH-AGNOSTIC | ThreatDownPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Positive | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike | ThreatDown EDR (native, required) |
| SIEM integrations | Built-in SIEM | Splunk Enterprise (log export)Microsoft Sentinel (log export)Google Chronicle (log export) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Not coveredIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processQuarantine |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Third-party/MSP-channel estimate: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs. Exact Adlumin standalone pricing not published. | MDR at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. |
| Minimum seats | None | 5 |
| Breach warranty | $500,000 | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Identity | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month pricing through MSP channel. Three tiers: MDR Base (identity-focused ITDR for M365 only), MDR Standard, MDR Advanced (adds 90-day retention). | Per-endpoint, published pricing. Four bundles: Core ($69), Advanced ($79), Elite ($99, includes MDR), Ultimate ($119, MDR+DNS+Premium). Server: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. 5-endpoint minimum. 10% discount for 2-year commitment. |
| Hidden cost warnings | MDR Base tier is identity-only (M365 ITDR). MDR Standard required for endpoint/network/cloud coverage.. Data retention upgrade (30 to 90 days) requires Advanced tier. Pricing designed for MSP channel. Direct enterprise pricing may differ or be unavailable.. N-able acquisition creates roadmap and integration uncertainty | Endpoint-only coverage, no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring. Platform-native lock-in, cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender. No dedicated analyst or account manager, pooled SOC model |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Annual, 2-year (10% discount) |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackTeamsPortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | North America |
| Onboarding | 30 minutes deployment (vendor-claimed), 600+ hours of pre-built playbooks included | Minutes after agent deployment |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareLegalGovernmentManufacturing | EducationGovernmentHealthcareManufacturingMSP/Channel |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | G2 4.8/5 and Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (3 reviews) show strong sentiment for customer support, ease of use, and platform features. Limited independent review data. MSP community reception to N-able acquisition is cautiously optimistic but creates integration uncertainty. | G2 4.6/5 (1,074 reviews) with multiple Leader awards (Best ROI, Easiest to Use). Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (904 reviews) for EDR, though MDR-specific reviews are fewer. MRG Effitas EPP Product of the Year 2025. IDC MarketScape 2024: Leader for endpoint security (Small Business). Praised for simplicity and price transparency. Main knock: endpoint-only with platform lock-in. |
| Compliance | HIPAAPCI DSSNISTGLBASOXFFIEC | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2016 | 2008 |
| Data retention | 30 days (Standard), 90 days (Advanced tier) | Not publicly disclosed |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between N-able and ThreatDown?
N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). N-able covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do N-able and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with N-able and not included with ThreatDown.
How does N-able pricing compare to ThreatDown?
N-able pricing: Third-party/MSP-channel estimate: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs. Exact Adlumin standalone pricing not published.. ThreatDown pricing: MDR at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with N-able: MDR Base tier is identity-only (M365 ITDR). MDR Standard required for endpoint/network/cloud coverage.; Data retention upgrade (30 to 90 days) requires Advanced tier. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage, no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in, cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose N-able or ThreatDown?
Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified XDR + SIEM + SOAR + UEBA platform to reduce vendor sprawl. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing. N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure and direct vendor relationships (MSP-channel only). ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.