N-able vs SentinelOne: MDR Comparison 2026
N-able (MSP-channel) and SentinelOne (EDR vendor) take different approaches to managed detection and response. N-able works with your existing tools, while SentinelOne requires its own security platform. N-able targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; SentinelOne focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. N-able includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for SentinelOne (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
N-able vs SentinelOne: Which Should You Choose?
Choose N-able if:
- •MSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA
- •SMBs and mid-market needing breach warranty protection
- •Organizations wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that works with existing EDR
- •You need SaaS and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose SentinelOne if:
- •Organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting $1M breach response warranty as financial backstop
- •Organizations valuing AI-first detection with Purple AI and Google Threat Intelligence integration
Bottom line: SentinelOne is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. N-able is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between N-able and SentinelOne?
N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SentinelOne is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: N-able offers Not disclosed, SentinelOne offers ≤1 hour. N-able covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for SentinelOne.
How do N-able and SentinelOne differ in response capabilities?
N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SentinelOne supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with N-able and not included with SentinelOne.
How does N-able pricing compare to SentinelOne?
N-able pricing: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs including MDR. SentinelOne pricing: MDR add-on: ~$17-35/endpoint/year (standard) or ~$35-50/endpoint/year (Pro/Elite). Total: ~$197-280/endpoint/year for platform + MDR. Example: 1,000 endpoints x $35 MDR x 5 years = ~$175K MDR add-on cost.. Watch for with N-able: Pricing designed for MSP channel; direct pricing may differ; MDR Base is identity-focused only; Complete needed for full coverage. Watch for with SentinelOne: Platform license ($69.99-$229.99/endpoint/year) is required BEFORE MDR — significant prerequisite cost; MDR pricing is a bolt-on fee separate from platform licensing — not shown on public pricing page.
Should I choose N-able or SentinelOne?
Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA. Choose SentinelOne if: organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor. N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure. SentinelOne is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or any non-SentinelOne EDR — platform-native lock-in.