N-able vs Secureworks: MDR Comparison 2026
N-able (MSP-channel) and Secureworks (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. N-able works with your existing tools, while Secureworks works with your existing tools. N-able targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Secureworks focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. N-able includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Secureworks (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
N-able vs Secureworks: Which Should You Choose?
Choose N-able if:
- •MSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA
- •SMBs and mid-market needing breach warranty protection
- •Organizations wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that works with existing EDR
- •You need SaaS coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (N-able offers one, Secureworks does not)
Choose Secureworks if:
- •Organizations valuing deep threat intelligence (CTU now part of Sophos X-Ops, still actively publishing)
- •Companies needing OT/ICS MDR coverage (Dragos, Claroty, Nozomi, SCADAfence integrations)
- •Financial services organizations needing FFIEC-examined technology service provider
Bottom line: N-able (MSP-channel) and Secureworks (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize N-able's unified security operations platform combining xdr, siem, soar, and ueba with mdr in one solution or Secureworks's enterprise-grade open xdr mdr with broad integration, ctu threat intelligence (now sophos x-ops),....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between N-able and Secureworks?
N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Secureworks is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: N-able offers Not disclosed, Secureworks offers ≤1 hour. N-able covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Secureworks.
How do N-able and Secureworks differ in response capabilities?
N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Secureworks supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does N-able pricing compare to Secureworks?
N-able pricing: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs including MDR. Secureworks pricing: PeerSpot community reports: ~$60K-$320K+/year depending on environment. One user: initial $160-170/endpoint negotiated to $110/endpoint. Another: ~$70 USD/agent/year with volume discounts. Available on AWS and Azure Marketplaces.. Watch for with N-able: Pricing designed for MSP channel; direct pricing may differ; MDR Base is identity-focused only; Complete needed for full coverage. Watch for with Secureworks: Sophos acquisition completed Feb 2025 — Taegis integration into Sophos Central underway, long-term platform consolidation likely; ~6% workforce reduction (~380 roles) in Feb 2025 post-acquisition — analyst continuity should be verified.
Should I choose N-able or Secureworks?
Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA. Choose Secureworks if: enterprise organizations wanting open XDR with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne, or Carbon Black EDR investments. N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure. Secureworks is not ideal for enterprise organizations concerned about Sophos's SMB/mid-market heritage and whether Taegis enterprise investment continues.