Lumifi vs Wirespeed
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Lumifi targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Lumifi includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Lumifi targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Lumifi includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Lumifi (Pure-play MDR) and Wirespeed (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Lumifi's pe-backed mdr roll-up with healthcare specialization, ex-military soc personnel, and a technology... or Wirespeed's wirespeed is most interesting as an automated mdr layer for msps, lean security teams and coaliti....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LumifiTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOne Singularity XDRVMware Carbon BlackPalo Alto Cortex XDR Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon | SentinelOnePalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | ExabeamElasticStellar CyberNetWitnessEventTracker (Netsurion platform) Microsoft Sentinel | Generic Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage areas, and platform integrations. No public pricing information available. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate service from the Critical Insight division, likely priced separately.. OT/ICS coverage requires the NetWitness partnership (announced Feb 2026) and is not part of standard MDR. Pricing and maturity of this offering are unknown.. Roll-up strategy means the service you buy today may have been three different companies 13 months ago. Ask about integration status between Datashield, Netsurion, and Critical Insight operations.. Zero public pricing. No way to benchmark costs before a sales conversation.. Single US SOC in Scottsdale, AZ. No follow-the-sun coverage, which may affect overnight response quality. | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | North America |
| Onboarding | Varies by integration complexity. API-based integrations for Microsoft Sentinel, Defender, and SentinelOne can take days to weeks. | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareCritical InfrastructureEnergyManufacturingFinancial ServicesLegalGovernment (local/state) | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.9/5 (25 reviews in Managed Security Services, 6 in MDR), but very small sample size. Virtually no Reddit or G2 discussion. Glassdoor 2.9/5 (25 employee reviews) with only 39% recommending and 22% positive business outlook. Compensation rated 3.3/5, down 17% year-over-year. The Gartner rating looks good on paper but the tiny review count and lack of independent practitioner discussion make it hard to assess real-world performance. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IINIST CSFHIPAAPCI DSS | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (SOC facility attestation) | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2022 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Customer data remains on customer infrastructure in co-managed model. Retention varies by platform and contract. | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Lumifi and Wirespeed?
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Lumifi covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do Lumifi and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
Lumifi supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does Lumifi pricing compare to Wirespeed?
Lumifi pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with Lumifi: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate service from the Critical Insight division, likely priced separately.; OT/ICS coverage requires the NetWitness partnership (announced Feb 2026) and is not part of standard MDR. Pricing and maturity of this offering are unknown.. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose Lumifi or Wirespeed?
Choose Lumifi if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. Lumifi is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics, transparent pricing, or independent validation (MITRE, Forrester) before committing. Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.