LMNTRIX vs Northwave
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Northwave is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Northwave serves Mid-market and Enterprise. LMNTRIX includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Northwave (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Northwave is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Northwave serves Mid-market and Enterprise. LMNTRIX includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Northwave (Endpoint, Network).
LMNTRIX is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Northwave is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product | Benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC |
| Price | Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product
- Price
- Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LMNTRIXPLATFORM | NorthwaveTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | LMNTRIX EDR (native)Third-party EDR log collection supported | Customer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | LMNTRIX SIEM (native, integrated)Microsoft Sentinel | Customer log sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint tiered pricing. Channel-only (sold exclusively through MSSP and channel partners). | Custom quote. Northwave does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation. Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Portal still maturing. PeerSpot reviewers describe it as buggy, so factor in potential operational friction during onboarding.. All performance claims are self-reported with no MITRE evaluation or third-party benchmark. Insist on a POV to validate in your environment. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. Rapid Response is a separate related service, so buyers should confirm what incident-response support is included in base MDR.. Cloud, SaaS and identity coverage are not named as clearly as endpoint, log and network telemetry.. Detection tuning depends on onboarding log sources and threat-based use cases, which may affect deployment effort. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom |
| Channels | SlackTeamsEmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Straightforward deployment with minimal configuration (per PeerSpot reviewers) | Northwave says implementation starts with a plan covering service elements, phases, planning and threat-based use cases, then onboarding log sources and processes. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyCritical Infrastructure | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingLogisticsTechnologyPublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | <1 minute for 90% of incidents (self-reported claim) | Not published |
| MTTR | 30 minutes for 90%+ of incidents (self-reported, no independent validation) | Not published |
| Community view | High scores on review platforms but from very small sample sizes. Praised for competitive pricing, all-inclusive model, and responsive support. Criticized for buggy portal and small company size. Zero Reddit presence and no G2 listing, which limits independent validation. | Northwave has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on European delivery, Utrecht SOC operations and the connection between MDR, CERT, red team and threat research. Buyers should validate response authority, cloud and identity coverage, pricing and escalation rules before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSSGDPR | NIS2ISO 27001GDPRTISAX |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSS | – |
| Founded | 2015 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between LMNTRIX and Northwave?
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Northwave is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LMNTRIX covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Northwave.
How do LMNTRIX and Northwave differ in response capabilities?
LMNTRIX supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Northwave supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with LMNTRIX and not included with Northwave.
How does LMNTRIX pricing compare to Northwave?
LMNTRIX pricing: Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone.. Northwave pricing: Not published. Watch for with LMNTRIX: Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation; Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Watch for with Northwave: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; Rapid Response is a separate related service, so buyers should confirm what incident-response support is included in base MDR..
Should I choose LMNTRIX or Northwave?
Choose LMNTRIX if: cost-conscious mid-market teams that want one platform covering endpoint, network, cloud, and identity without add-on fees. Choose Northwave if: benelux, DACH and Nordic buyers that want European MDR with a Utrecht SOC. LMNTRIX is not ideal for risk-averse enterprise buyers who need vendor scale, financial backing, or third-party validated detection metrics. Northwave is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.