Kudelski Security vs suresecure
Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. suresecure is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Kudelski Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; suresecure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Kudelski Security includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for suresecure ().
Buyer brief
Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. suresecure is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Kudelski Security targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; suresecure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Kudelski Security includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for suresecure ().
Kudelski Security (Pure-play MDR) and suresecure (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Kudelski Security's technology-agnostic mdr with strong analyst recognition (gartner 8 years, forrester, bloor) and o... or suresecure's suresecure fits dach buyers that want a german services firm to run mdr and incident-response man....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace | DACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps |
| Price | Custom quote | EUR 7,999/mo for 2 months, up to 500 assets |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- DACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps
- Price
- EUR 7,999/mo for 2 months, up to 500 assets
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Kudelski SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | suresecureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderSentinelOneSophosCarbon BlackCybereasonCisco Secure Endpoint CrowdStrike | Trend Micro CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel Splunk | Google Chronicle Splunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization. | Proof of Value: EUR 7,999/month plus VAT for 2 months, up to 500 assets. Ongoing MDR pricing is not published. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint pricing, not based on data volume. Modular and all-in-one subscription options. | Custom quote for ongoing Managed SOC and MDR. suresecure publishes a fixed-price 2-month Managed SOC Proof of Value. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.. DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR. OT/ICS coverage requires the dedicated MDR for OT variant, priced separately. No public pricing at all. Enterprise positioning suggests premium cost. | The published Proof of Value price applies only up to 500 connected assets and lasts 2 months.. Public pages do not publish ongoing MDR prices, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Exact response authority and automated action rights need written playbooks.. Google SecOps licensing, log ingestion and storage can affect the final bill.. Co-managed SOC is aimed at teams that already have SIEM expertise. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom enterprise agreements | Custom, Proof of Value |
| Channels | SlackPortalPhoneEmail | EmailPhonePortal |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeNorth America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Weeks. Starts with a business context assessment covering strategy, risk exposure, and likely threats. | suresecure says most log sources can be connected within a few hours on the MDR page, the Managed SOC page says go-live can happen in 4 weeks and the Proof of Value sheet says onboarding takes a few days. Buyers should confirm scope by log source and response playbook. |
| Industry focus | Critical InfrastructureEnergy & UtilitiesFinancial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentManufacturing (OT/ICS) | ManufacturingHealthcareEnergyRetailProfessional ServicesSports and EntertainmentCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published as a specific number | Not published |
| MTTR | Less than 15 minutes on high-severity incidents (vendor-published, not independently validated) | Not published |
| Community view | Well-recognized by analysts (Gartner 8 years running, Forrester Strong Performer, Bloor Champion) but almost invisible in community channels. Zero meaningful reviews on G2 or PeerSpot, no Reddit discussion. Enterprise and critical infrastructure buyers don't post much, which leaves a validation gap. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in G2, PeerSpot, Gartner Peer Insights or Reddit. The public buyer case rests on German SOC delivery, Google SecOps specialization, ISO 27001 status, named reference logos and a published Proof of Value offer, but buyers should validate pricing, response authority, analyst staffing and threat-hunting scope directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022ISO 27017:2015ISO 27018:2019SOC 2 Type IICyber Essentials (UK)UK G-Cloud | ISO 27001GDPRNIS2 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2022 (certified since 2015)ISO 27017:2015 (certified since 2022)ISO 27018:2019 (certified since 2022)SOC 2 Type II (AICPA)Cyber Essentials (UK government scheme)UK G-Cloud (certified cloud security provider)Microsoft Solutions Partner (Security)Google Cloud Partner (MSSP)FIRST Membership (Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams) | ISO 27001BSI-certified incident expertsGoogle Cloud Security PartnerISG Provider Lens Next-Gen SOC/MDR Services Midmarket Leader |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Data retention | 12 months hot data. Unlimited ingestion, priced per endpoint rather than by data volume. | No standard MDR retention period was found. The Co-Managed SOC page says normalized SIEM data is processed in suresecure's cloud-native SOC architecture but not stored there, with data sovereignty remaining with the customer. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Kudelski Security and suresecure?
Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). suresecure is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kudelski Security covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for suresecure.
How do Kudelski Security and suresecure differ in response capabilities?
Kudelski Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. suresecure supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Kudelski Security and included with suresecure.
How does Kudelski Security pricing compare to suresecure?
Kudelski Security pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization.. suresecure pricing: Proof of Value: EUR 7,999/month plus VAT for 2 months, up to 500 assets. Ongoing MDR pricing is not published.. Watch for with Kudelski Security: Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.; DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR. Watch for with suresecure: The published Proof of Value price applies only up to 500 connected assets and lasts 2 months.; Public pages do not publish ongoing MDR prices, contract minimums or service-credit language..
Should I choose Kudelski Security or suresecure?
Choose Kudelski Security if: mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace. Choose suresecure if: dACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps. Kudelski Security is not ideal for sMBs or budget-conscious buyers. No public pricing and enterprise positioning signals premium cost.. suresecure is not ideal for buyers that need public ongoing MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.