Intezer vs Wirespeed
Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Intezer targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Intezer includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Intezer targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Intezer includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Intezer (AI-native MDR) and Wirespeed (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Intezer's ai-first approach to soc operations delivers sub-minute triage across all alerts or Wirespeed's wirespeed is most interesting as an automated mdr layer for msps, lean security teams and coaliti....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | IntezerTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderPalo Alto Cortex XDR SentinelOne | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for EndpointPalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkElasticDevoSumo LogicWazuh Microsoft Sentinel | Generic Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Contact sales for pricing. | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint pricing with two tiers: Starter (one alert source) and Complete (unlimited alert sources). Pricing remains fixed regardless of alert volume increases. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M). Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier.. Managed SIEM and premium SLA support are paid add-ons on top of the base subscription. Full incident response not included. You get triage and guided remediation, not hands-on response. CarbonHelix 24/7 SOC is a separate engagement. | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalSlack | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Full query access | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | North America |
| Onboarding | Minutes to connect alert sources via API | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailHospitalityLogistics | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Sub-minute (median under 60 seconds) | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | Users praise the intuitive UI, fast integration and detailed forensic analysis. Limited review volume compared to larger MDR vendors. Main concerns center on pricing transparency and the fact that escalated alerts go to your team, not Intezer analysts. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2015 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Intezer and Wirespeed?
Intezer is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Intezer covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do Intezer and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
Intezer supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does Intezer pricing compare to Wirespeed?
Intezer pricing: Not published. Contact sales for pricing.. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with Intezer: No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M); Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier.. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose Intezer or Wirespeed?
Choose Intezer if: teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. Intezer is not ideal for organizations requiring traditional human-led MDR with dedicated analysts for every escalation. Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.