InfoGuard vs Truesec
InfoGuard and Truesec are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Truesec serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Truesec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard and Truesec are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Truesec serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Truesec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Truesec offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 4). InfoGuard may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | TruesecTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOnePalo Alto Cortex |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Microsoft SentinelCrowdStrike Falcon LogScaleSplunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Fixed fee per endpoint. No log volume or retention surcharges. No public pricing for any tier. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | No public pricing for any tier, requires sales engagement for any estimate. IR is a separate retainer on Core and Enterprise, only Black includes it. US customers may get a different experience since bulk of 350+ specialists are in Europe |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhoneTeamsSlack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | 72 hours for Core and Enterprise. Black tier not disclosed. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareEnergyCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Effectively unrateable. No public reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Not in Forrester Wave or Gartner MQ for MDR. No Reddit mentions. Strong Nordic reputation based on vendor claims and partner references (EY, Microsoft MISA), but impossible to validate through independent peer feedback. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 14001MISA (Microsoft Intelligent Security Association) |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 14001 |
| Founded | 2001 | 2005 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Included in fixed fee, no log volume or retention surcharges. Specific retention periods not disclosed. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Truesec?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Truesec is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Truesec.
How do InfoGuard and Truesec differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Truesec supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with Truesec.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Truesec?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Truesec pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Truesec: No public pricing for any tier, requires sales engagement for any estimate; IR is a separate retainer on Core and Enterprise, only Black includes it.
Should I choose InfoGuard or Truesec?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Truesec if: nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Truesec is not ideal for uS-based organizations wanting a fully staffed local SOC (bulk of specialists in Europe).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.