InfoGuard vs ThreatSpike
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatSpike serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for ThreatSpike (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatSpike serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for ThreatSpike (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
ThreatSpike is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. InfoGuard is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Lean IT or security teams that want the provider to own both IT operations context and security response |
| Price | Custom quote | Managed IT + security bundle: $135/user/mo |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · No approval |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Lean IT or security teams that want the provider to own both IT operations context and security response
- Price
- Managed IT + security bundle: $135/user/mo
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | ThreatSpikePLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | ThreatSpike proprietary EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Third-party feeds supported, specific SIEM integrations not published |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Fully Autonomous |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateContain |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Published fixed $135/user/month for broader managed IT + security subscription, not MDR-only. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Published fixed per-user monthly subscription bundling fully managed IT, defensive security and offensive security. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | ThreatSpike is not a narrow MDR-only SKU. Buyers that only want monitoring on top of an existing IT team may be buying a broader managed IT replacement model.. The platform is proprietary and built in-house. Validate exit process, data export and whether existing EDR/SIEM investments can remain primary.. $135/user/month can be attractive if it replaces IT, MDR and pen testing vendors, but expensive if treated as MDR-only.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit language was found despite the 2 to 5 minute response claim. |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | HospitalityFinancial ServicesManufacturingProfessional ServicesRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | 2 to 5 minute automated incident response/resolve time (vendor-reported) |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | G2 shows 4.9/5 across 32 reviews, with most reviews categorized under Managed Security Services and a mix of SMB, mid-market and enterprise reviewers. Review themes support the consolidation, support and pricing story, but independent analyst coverage appears thinner than larger MDR providers and public review volume is still modest. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusPCI DSS |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusCREST-certified penetration testing providerPCI DSS compliant |
| Founded | 2001 | 2011 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and ThreatSpike?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for ThreatSpike.
How do InfoGuard and ThreatSpike differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatSpike supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to ThreatSpike?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. ThreatSpike pricing: Published fixed $135/user/month for broader managed IT + security subscription, not MDR-only.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with ThreatSpike: ThreatSpike is not a narrow MDR-only SKU. Buyers that only want monitoring on top of an existing IT team may be buying a broader managed IT replacement model.; The platform is proprietary and built in-house. Validate exit process, data export and whether existing EDR/SIEM investments can remain primary..
Should I choose InfoGuard or ThreatSpike?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose ThreatSpike if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want to replace fragmented MSP, MDR and penetration-testing vendors with one fixed-price provider. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. ThreatSpike is not ideal for organizations seeking a narrow MDR overlay on top of an existing mature SOC and tool stack.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.