InfoGuard vs TENEX.AI
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; TENEX.AI serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for TENEX.AI (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; TENEX.AI serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for TENEX.AI (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
InfoGuard (Services firm) and TENEX.AI (AI-native MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b... or TENEX.AI's tenex.ai fits buyers that want an ai-native mdr model with human analyst oversight and are alread....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model |
| Price | Custom quote | $99K-$199K/package; billing period unstated |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model
- Price
- $99K-$199K/package; billing period unstated
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | TENEX.AITECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Google Security OperationsGoogle ChronicleMicrosoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Vendor-published $99,000-$199,000 package range: $99,000 for 25TB Essential AI-Native MDR, $149,000 for 50TB Standard 24/7 MDR, and $199,000 for 100TB Enhanced + 24/7 MDR. Billing period not stated. Enterprise is custom. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Package pricing by telemetry tier plus custom enterprise quotes. The homepage lists 25TB, 50TB and 100TB MDR packages, but the billing period and overage terms are not stated on the page. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Homepage pricing is published by TB tier, but billing period, overage rates and telemetry-source assumptions are not stated.. No public contractual SLA found.. No public breach warranty found.. Exact response approval rules are not published.. Ticketing integrations, data retention and evidence export details are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmail |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | TechnologyFinancial ServicesBusiness Services |
| MTTD | Not published | AI telemetry analysis within a minute, vendor-reported in third-party coverage |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | TENEX.AI is a young AI-native MDR provider with public funding coverage and partner claims, but independent practitioner review volume is still thin. The main public evidence is official product material, a January 2025 launch announcement and March 2026 funding coverage. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | – |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | – |
| Founded | 2001 | 2024 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and TENEX.AI?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). TENEX.AI is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for TENEX.AI.
How do InfoGuard and TENEX.AI differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. TENEX.AI supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to TENEX.AI?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. TENEX.AI pricing: Vendor-published $99,000-$199,000 package range: $99,000 for 25TB Essential AI-Native MDR, $149,000 for 50TB Standard 24/7 MDR, and $199,000 for 100TB Enhanced + 24/7 MDR. Billing period not stated. Enterprise is custom.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with TENEX.AI: Homepage pricing is published by TB tier, but billing period, overage rates and telemetry-source assumptions are not stated.; No public contractual SLA found..
Should I choose InfoGuard or TENEX.AI?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose TENEX.AI if: mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. TENEX.AI is not ideal for buyers who need complete public pricing, including billing period and overage terms, before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.