InfoGuard vs SECUINFRA
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
InfoGuard (Services firm) and SECUINFRA (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b... or SECUINFRA's fits german and eu buyers that put data sovereignty first and want a partner that will work insid....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | SECUINFRATECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Microsoft SentinelSplunkElasticIBM QRadar |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom quote, varies by chosen tier (full-service MDR, Co-Managed MDR, On-Premises MDR) and integrated SIEM and EDR. Sold direct. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing. Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response. No published SLA, response timing depends on the underlying SIEM and EDR you bring |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Vendor reports onboarding compressed from 1 week to 1 day for Microsoft-stack customers |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | ManufacturingFinancial ServicesPublic SectorHealthcareEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | SECUINFRA has a Gartner Peer Insights vendor profile in the MDR category but limited English-language community coverage on G2 and PeerSpot. Most public sentiment comes from German-language IT press and the firm's own publishing. Buyers shopping outside Germany should expect to lean on direct references. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | ISO 27001:2013 |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | ISO 27001:2013 (TÜV Thüringen, scope covers Berlin and Frankfurt) |
| Founded | 2001 | 2010 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and SECUINFRA?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for SECUINFRA.
How do InfoGuard and SECUINFRA differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SECUINFRA supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to SECUINFRA?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. SECUINFRA pricing: Not published. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with SECUINFRA: On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing; Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response.
Should I choose InfoGuard or SECUINFRA?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose SECUINFRA if: german SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. SECUINFRA is not ideal for non-European multinationals needing 24/7 follow-the-sun coverage from regional SOCs.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.