InfoGuard vs Recon InfoSec
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Recon InfoSec serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Recon InfoSec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Recon InfoSec serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Recon InfoSec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
InfoGuard (Services firm) and Recon InfoSec (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b... or Recon InfoSec's recon infosec is a strong fit for buyers who want managed security operations with broad integrat....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | Recon InfoSecTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | LimaCharlieCrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft DefenderCarbon BlackBitdefender GravityZoneBlackBerry CylanceSophosTrend MicroSymantecQualys EDRRSA NetWitness EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | SplunkSumo LogicStellar CyberAlienVaultArcSightGoogle ChronicleDevoElasticExabeamFortiSIEMIBM QRadarLogPointLogRhythmLogz.ioRapid7 InsightIDRRSA NetWitness |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom pricing. No public price bands, per-user pricing or minimums found. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Recon MDR appears closer to full managed security operations than a narrow endpoint-only MDR SKU, so buyers should confirm the modules included in the quoted scope.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Default autonomous response actions are not published. Confirm which actions Recon can take without approval.. Physical SOC locations, analyst count and raw data export terms are not public. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not published as a standard timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Financial ServicesHealthcareOil and GasManufacturingUtilitiesGovernmentEducationConstructionRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Recon publishes a +97 NPS claim, customer testimonials, logos and public practitioner/community signals around OpenSOC, SOC X and Thursday Defensive. Independent third-party review volume is limited: no meaningful G2 or Gartner MDR review profile was found in this pass. Public community signal is sparse, so buyer validation should lean on references and proof-of-value work. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | AICPA SOC 2 Type IITIPS Awarded VendorTexas DIR Approved Vendor |
| Founded | 2001 | 2018 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Recon InfoSec?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Recon InfoSec.
How do InfoGuard and Recon InfoSec differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Recon InfoSec supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Recon InfoSec?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Recon InfoSec pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Recon InfoSec: Recon MDR appears closer to full managed security operations than a narrow endpoint-only MDR SKU, so buyers should confirm the modules included in the quoted scope.; No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found..
Should I choose InfoGuard or Recon InfoSec?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Recon InfoSec if: organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Recon InfoSec is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.