InfoGuard vs Quorum Cyber
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Quorum Cyber serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Quorum Cyber serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
InfoGuard (Services firm) and Quorum Cyber (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize InfoGuard's infoguard fits dach buyers that want a swiss services firm to run mdr, co-managed soc and csirt-b... or Quorum Cyber's the strongest microsoft-native mdr option with a tiered model spanning smb to enterprise, backed ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | Quorum CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Contact for custom quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Not published. Described as 'flexible subscription model' with pricing based on environment size and risk profile. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.. Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably.. Identity coverage (ITDR) and data security (Clarity Data) are separate services at lower tiers. AWS and GCP coverage only available in Clarity Protect (top tier) |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Financial ServicesEducationPublic SectorManufacturingProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR as Representative Vendor (2024, 2025). Microsoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025. First UK Microsoft Verified MXDR provider. Very limited independent review data: no ratings on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights with sufficient reviews. Zero Reddit presence. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Cyber Essentials |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 (UKAS-level audit)CREST (Vulnerability Assessment, Pen Testing, CSIR)Cyber EssentialsMicrosoft Verified MXDR SolutionMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025Gartner Market Guide for MDR Representative Vendor (2024, 2025) |
| Founded | 2001 | 2016 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Data resides in customer's own Microsoft Sentinel instance / Azure tenant. Retention governed by customer's Azure configuration. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Quorum Cyber?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do InfoGuard and Quorum Cyber differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Quorum Cyber supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with Quorum Cyber.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Quorum Cyber?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Quorum Cyber pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Quorum Cyber: Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.; Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably..
Should I choose InfoGuard or Quorum Cyber?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Quorum Cyber if: microsoft-committed organizations (E3/E5) wanting MDR built natively on Sentinel and Defender with data staying in their own Azure tenant. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Quorum Cyber is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or any non-Microsoft primary EDR. Quorum Cyber is Microsoft-only..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.