InfoGuard vs Optiv
InfoGuard and Optiv are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Optiv serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Optiv (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard and Optiv are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Optiv serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Optiv (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Optiv offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 4). InfoGuard may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Enterprises with a multi-vendor security stack that want a managed layer without replacing core tools |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 4/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Enterprises with a multi-vendor security stack that want a managed layer without replacing core tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | OptivTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Multi-vendor EDRMicrosoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Google Security Operations |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateContainDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom enterprise pricing, with analyst coverage, Google Security Operations data processing, log management, data retention, active-defense hours and optional TAM/manual hunting scoped by environment. Optiv/KuppingerCole materials describe a data-processed pricing model. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Optiv MDR is built for complex environments; buyers should model Google Security Operations ingestion and retention volume before comparing it with per-endpoint MDR quotes.. The service can manage many existing tools, but those EDR, identity, cloud and network tools remain separate licensing costs.. Active defense is described as 40 hours per year. Clarify the hourly rate and escalation path once that allocation is consumed.. TAM and custom manual threat hunting are optional components, not baseline inclusions.. No public price floor, public SLA or breach warranty was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year, Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not published. Scope depends on data sources, Google Security Operations setup, detection content and SOAR playbook integration. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingRetailTechnologyPublic Sector |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Optiv has strong brand recognition as a large cyber advisory and technology-services firm, but MDR-specific peer review volume is thinner than for MDR-first vendors. Gartner Peer Insights lists Optiv reviews in managed security services rather than a separate high-volume MDR product page. Reddit discussion is mostly about Optiv as a reseller and services firm, not day-to-day MDR operations. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | SOC 2ISO 27001PCI DSSHIPAAHITRUSTNIST CSFCMMC |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | Optiv publishes support for compliance programs including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, HITRUST, NIST CSF and CMMC. Specific MDR service audit-scope documents require buyer validation. |
| Founded | 2001 | 2015 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Optiv states 12 months of hot storage is available for on-demand access. Longer retention terms are not publicly described. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Optiv?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Optiv is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Optiv.
How do InfoGuard and Optiv differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Optiv supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with Optiv.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Optiv?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Optiv pricing: Not published. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Optiv: Optiv MDR is built for complex environments; buyers should model Google Security Operations ingestion and retention volume before comparing it with per-endpoint MDR quotes.; The service can manage many existing tools, but those EDR, identity, cloud and network tools remain separate licensing costs..
Should I choose InfoGuard or Optiv?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Optiv if: enterprises with a multi-vendor security stack that want a managed layer without replacing core tools. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Optiv is not ideal for sMBs wanting simple per-endpoint MDR pricing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.