InfoGuard vs Nomios
InfoGuard and Nomios are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Nomios serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
InfoGuard and Nomios are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Nomios serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | European buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | NomiosTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender for EndpointCustomer EDR through Custom MDR |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Nomios Sovereign Managed SIEMMicrosoft SentinelSplunkIBM QRadarPalo Alto Networks XSIAM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Tiered Guardian xMDR pricing and custom pricing for tailored MDR. Public materials state Guardian xMDR has Essential, Core, Advanced and Elite tiers, with scoping starting from endpoint count and expanding by coverage needs. Public price amounts are not listed. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Nomios says Guardian xMDR has transparent tier-based pricing, but public price amounts are not listed.. Guardian xMDR is built on Cortex XDR, so buyers should price Palo Alto licensing and migration effort if they are not already on that stack.. Coverage outside Cortex XDR's native library may require the Sovereign Managed SIEM extension.. Custom MDR can keep existing tools, but SIEM, EDR and data-retention costs remain part of total cost.. No public breach warranty, trial or fixed response-time SLA was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Subscription, Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not published. Guardian xMDR is positioned as structured and fast to deploy; Custom MDR is scoped through direct engagement based on existing tools and required detection engineering. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | HealthcareManufacturingFinancial ServicesGovernmentRetailTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Nomios has a European infrastructure and security-services footprint, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. The clearest public evidence is from Nomios' own MDR page and Guardian xMDR launch material rather than independent managed-service evaluations. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGDPRNIS2DORA |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | ISO 27001SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | 2001 | 2004 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published as a fixed MDR retention period. Nomios states Guardian xMDR customer data is hosted within the EU; retention should be confirmed by tier and SIEM scope. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Nomios?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Nomios is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do InfoGuard and Nomios differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Nomios supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with Nomios.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Nomios?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Nomios pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Nomios: Nomios says Guardian xMDR has transparent tier-based pricing, but public price amounts are not listed.; Guardian xMDR is built on Cortex XDR, so buyers should price Palo Alto licensing and migration effort if they are not already on that stack..
Should I choose InfoGuard or Nomios?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Nomios if: european buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Nomios is not ideal for buyers that need public per-endpoint price amounts before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.