InfoGuard vs NetWitness
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. NetWitness is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; NetWitness serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for NetWitness (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. NetWitness is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; NetWitness serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for NetWitness (Endpoint, Network).
NetWitness is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. InfoGuard is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | NetWitnessPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | NetWitness Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | NetWitness LogsNetWitness Platform XDR |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom quote. Public materials describe customized MDR offerings based on NetWitness Platform XDR scope, analyst support, administration needs, threat hunting, incident management and partner delivery. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | The MDR offer is tied to NetWitness Platform XDR. Buyers without NetWitness deployed should price platform licensing, deployment and operations effort alongside MDR service fees.. The public MDR datasheet describes customized services, so scope may vary by customer and delivery partner.. Current IT/OT MDR material is a NetWitness and Lumifi partnership. Buyers should confirm which company owns monitoring, escalation, response authority and support accountability.. No public price floor, public response SLA, breach warranty or trial was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not published. Scope depends on the existing NetWitness Platform XDR deployment, telemetry sources, detection content, administration needs and Lumifi or other partner involvement. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | GovernmentFinancial ServicesEnergyHealthcareTransportationIndustrial |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | NetWitness has a long-running platform business, but MDR-specific public peer reviews are limited and current public materials lean on datasheets and partnership announcements. Buyers should validate references for the exact delivery model: NetWitness Professional Services, Lumifi, or another certified partner. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | – |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | – |
| Founded | 2001 | 1997 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published for MDR. Retention depends on the customer's NetWitness Platform XDR and log-storage architecture. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and NetWitness?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NetWitness is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for NetWitness.
How do InfoGuard and NetWitness differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. NetWitness supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with NetWitness.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to NetWitness?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. NetWitness pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with NetWitness: The MDR offer is tied to NetWitness Platform XDR. Buyers without NetWitness deployed should price platform licensing, deployment and operations effort alongside MDR service fees.; The public MDR datasheet describes customized services, so scope may vary by customer and delivery partner..
Should I choose InfoGuard or NetWitness?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose NetWitness if: organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. NetWitness is not ideal for buyers wanting public per-endpoint MDR pricing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.