Huntress vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
Huntress (MSP-channel) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Huntress requires its own security platform, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. Huntress targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Huntress includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Huntress vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
- •You need SaaS and Identity coverage included in base pricing
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: Huntress (MSP-channel) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Huntress's the msp community's gold standard for smb-focused mdr or ThreatDown's one of the most affordable mdr options with fully published pricing ($99/endpoint/year).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Huntress and ThreatDown?
Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Huntress covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Huntress and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does Huntress pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Huntress or ThreatDown?
Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).