Huntress vs Arctic Wolf: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Huntress and Arctic Wolf managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Arctic Wolf
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Arctic Wolf
5 vs 3 surfaces
Integrations
Tie
Similar breadth
Criteria
Best-in-class concierge model for mid-market organizations needing a dedicated security partner. Technology-agnostic design avoids vendor lock-in. $3M warranty is the industry's largest. Trade-off is limited data transparency and guided (not active) remediation.
Response Type
Guided Response
Guided Response
Approval Policy
N/A
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✗
✓
Kill Process
✗
✓
IR Included
Separate
Separate
Response SLA
Not disclosed
≤1 hour
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
N/A
EmailPortalPhone
Data Access
N/A
Dashboards
Model
Not published
Per-user monthly pricing; tiered by user count and contract term
Price Range
Not published
Starting ~$20/user/month; MDR Basic ~$44,000/year for up to 100 users. Enterprise pricing is custom.
Minimum Seats
N/A
None
Threat Hunting
N/A
✓ Included
Overall
N/A
Positive
Summary
N/A
Highly rated with strong praise for the Concierge Security Team model and ease of use. Criticisms center on false positives, limited data transparency, and the guided (rather than hands-on) response model.
Huntress vs Arctic Wolf: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- You need guided response
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB
Choose Arctic Wolf if:
- You need guided response
- ≤1 hour response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Huntress and Arctic Wolf?
Key differences: response model (Guided Response vs Guided Response), SLA (Not disclosed vs ≤1 hour), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Technology Agnostic).