Hitachi Cyber vs suresecure
Hitachi Cyber and suresecure are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Hitachi Cyber targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while suresecure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Hitachi Cyber includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 0 for suresecure ().
Buyer brief
Hitachi Cyber and suresecure are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Hitachi Cyber targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while suresecure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Hitachi Cyber includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 0 for suresecure ().
Hitachi Cyber offers broader coverage (6 surfaces vs. 0). suresecure may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with | DACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps |
| Price | Custom quote | EUR 7,999/mo for 2 months, up to 500 assets |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- DACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps
- Price
- EUR 7,999/mo for 2 months, up to 500 assets
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Hitachi CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC | suresecureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOneMicrosoft Defender CrowdStrike | Trend Micro CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel Splunk, Google Chronicle | Google Chronicle, Splunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Proof of Value: EUR 7,999/month plus VAT for 2 months, up to 500 assets. Ongoing MDR pricing is not published. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote, not published. Sold direct. | Custom quote for ongoing Managed SOC and MDR. suresecure publishes a fixed-price 2-month Managed SOC Proof of Value. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation. OT coverage routes through the new Krakow SOC and may change response timing if your assets sit elsewhere. Services span MDR, MSS and consulting under one roof, scope creep into adjacent services is easy | The published Proof of Value price applies only up to 500 connected assets and lasts 2 months.. Public pages do not publish ongoing MDR prices, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Exact response authority and automated action rights need written playbooks.. Google SecOps licensing, log ingestion and storage can affect the final bill.. Co-managed SOC is aimed at teams that already have SIEM expertise. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, Proof of Value |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhonePortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | suresecure says most log sources can be connected within a few hours on the MDR page, the Managed SOC page says go-live can happen in 4 weeks and the Proof of Value sheet says onboarding takes a few days. Buyers should confirm scope by log source and response playbook. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyManufacturingTransportationHealthcarePublic Sector | ManufacturingHealthcareEnergyRetailProfessional ServicesSports and EntertainmentCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Hitachi Cyber has limited public review presence on G2, Gartner Peer Insights and PeerSpot for its MDR service specifically. Most independent coverage focuses on the Hitachi corporate parent or Above Security heritage rather than current customer experience. Buyers will need to lean on direct references. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in G2, PeerSpot, Gartner Peer Insights or Reddit. The public buyer case rests on German SOC delivery, Google SecOps specialization, ISO 27001 status, named reference logos and a published Proof of Value offer, but buyers should validate pricing, response authority, analyst staffing and threat-hunting scope directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 9001 (MSS)PCI QSA (Canada, US, LATAM, Caribbean)FIRST member | ISO 27001GDPRNIS2 |
| Certifications | ISO 9001PCI QSAFIRST | ISO 27001BSI-certified incident expertsGoogle Cloud Security PartnerISG Provider Lens Next-Gen SOC/MDR Services Midmarket Leader |
| Founded | 1999 | 2017 |
| Data retention | Not published | No standard MDR retention period was found. The Co-Managed SOC page says normalized SIEM data is processed in suresecure's cloud-native SOC architecture but not stored there, with data sovereignty remaining with the customer. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Hitachi Cyber and suresecure?
Hitachi Cyber is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). suresecure is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Hitachi Cyber covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for suresecure.
How do Hitachi Cyber and suresecure differ in response capabilities?
Hitachi Cyber supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. suresecure supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Hitachi Cyber pricing compare to suresecure?
Hitachi Cyber pricing: Not published. suresecure pricing: Proof of Value: EUR 7,999/month plus VAT for 2 months, up to 500 assets. Ongoing MDR pricing is not published.. Watch for with Hitachi Cyber: Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation; OT coverage routes through the new Krakow SOC and may change response timing if your assets sit elsewhere. Watch for with suresecure: The published Proof of Value price applies only up to 500 connected assets and lasts 2 months.; Public pages do not publish ongoing MDR prices, contract minimums or service-credit language..
Should I choose Hitachi Cyber or suresecure?
Choose Hitachi Cyber if: existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with. Choose suresecure if: dACH mid-market buyers wanting German-operated SOC and MDR on Google SecOps. Hitachi Cyber is not ideal for buyers who need published SLA commitments or independently validated detection metrics. suresecure is not ideal for buyers that need public ongoing MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.