glueckkanja vs WithSecure: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and WithSecure (EDR vendor) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while WithSecure requires its own security platform. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; WithSecure focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 5 for WithSecure (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs WithSecure: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose WithSecure if:
- •European mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance
- •Companies wanting a single-vendor platform (EPP + EDR + XDR + MDR) with included IR
- •Organizations needing NCSC CIR Level 1 assured incident response (UK/EU government-adjacent)
Bottom line: glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and WithSecure (EDR vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize glueckkanja's elite microsoft-native mxdr from one of only three globally microsoft-verified partners or WithSecure's the strongest european-focused mdr option for organizations prioritizing data sovereignty — forre....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and WithSecure?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). WithSecure is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for WithSecure.
How do glueckkanja and WithSecure differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. WithSecure supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to WithSecure?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. WithSecure pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Custom quotes required. Described as 'competitively priced for mid-sized businesses.' ITPro rated pricing 5/5 stars.. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with WithSecure: Platform lock-in — requires WithSecure Elements EDR (cannot use competing EDR); Modular pricing — full coverage across identity, cloud, SaaS, and exposure management adds cost.
Should I choose glueckkanja or WithSecure?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose WithSecure if: european mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. WithSecure is not ideal for uS-centric organizations wanting FedRAMP or deep US federal compliance.