glueckkanja vs Todyl: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Todyl (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while Todyl requires its own security platform. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl focuses on SMB and Mid-market. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs Todyl: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose Todyl if:
- •MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management
- •SMBs with lean security teams wanting a dedicated security contact (DRAM) at an accessible price point
- •Greenfield deployments with no existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments to preserve
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Todyl (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize glueckkanja's elite microsoft-native mxdr from one of only three globally microsoft-verified partners or Todyl's sase, edr, siem, mxdr, soar, and grc in a single agent with a dedicated dram per customer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and Todyl?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Todyl is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Todyl.
How do glueckkanja and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with glueckkanja and not included with Todyl.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to Todyl?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in -- must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base -- unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose glueckkanja or Todyl?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments -- requires full Todyl stack adoption.