glueckkanja vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network and OT/ICS coverage included in base pricing
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize glueckkanja's elite microsoft-native mxdr from one of only three globally microsoft-verified partners or ThreatDown's one of the most affordable mdr options with fully published pricing ($99/endpoint/year).
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and ThreatDown?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do glueckkanja and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with glueckkanja and not included with ThreatDown.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to ThreatDown?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose glueckkanja or ThreatDown?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).