glueckkanja vs Sophos: MDR Comparison 2026
glueckkanja (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Sophos (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. glueckkanja requires its own security platform, while Sophos works with your existing tools. glueckkanja targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Sophos focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. glueckkanja includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 5 for Sophos (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
glueckkanja vs Sophos: Which Should You Choose?
Choose glueckkanja if:
- •European enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty
- •Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender
- •Companies wanting Microsoft-Verified MXDR with Copilot for Security
- •You need Cloud coverage included in base pricing
Choose Sophos if:
- •SMBs and mid-market organizations seeking an all-in-one MDR with inclusive IR
- •Organizations with diverse, multi-vendor security stacks needing broad integration support
- •Companies wanting straightforward pricing with predictable costs
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Sophos offers one, glueckkanja does not)
Bottom line: glueckkanja is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Sophos is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between glueckkanja and Sophos?
glueckkanja is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Sophos is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: glueckkanja offers Not disclosed, Sophos offers ≤15 minutes. glueckkanja covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Sophos.
How do glueckkanja and Sophos differ in response capabilities?
glueckkanja supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Sophos supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does glueckkanja pricing compare to Sophos?
glueckkanja pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Sophos pricing: Custom quote required; tiered pricing bands (10-24, 25-49, 50-99, etc.) (10-seat minimum). Watch for with glueckkanja: Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are separate and customer-borne; Requires Microsoft Defender suite licensing. Watch for with Sophos: MDR Essentials does NOT include breach warranty or full incident response — those require MDR Complete; Linux server protection requires separate Sophos Workload Protection subscription.
Should I choose glueckkanja or Sophos?
Choose glueckkanja if: european enterprises requiring German/EU data sovereignty. Choose Sophos if: sMBs and mid-market organizations seeking an all-in-one MDR with inclusive IR. glueckkanja is not ideal for organizations outside Europe needing local SOC presence. Sophos is not ideal for large enterprises needing deep, custom detection engineering.